TY - JOUR
T1 - Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) risk prediction models: Development, internal validation, and comparison with existing risk prediction models identified in a systematic literature review
AU - Gwilym, Brenig L.
AU - Ambler, Graeme K.
AU - Saratzis, Athanasios
AU - Bosanquet, David C.
AU - Stather, Philip
AU - Singh, Aminder
AU - Mancuso, Enrico
AU - Arifi, Mohedin
AU - Altabal, Mohamed
AU - Elhadi, Ahmed
AU - Althini, Abdulmunem
AU - Ahmed, Hazem
AU - Davies, Huw
AU - Rangaraju, Madhu
AU - Juszczak, Maciej
AU - Nicholls, Jonathan
AU - Platt, Nicholas
AU - Olivier, James
AU - Kirkham, Emily
AU - Cooper, David
AU - Roy, Iain
AU - Harrison, Gareth
AU - Ackah, James
AU - Mittapalli, Devender
AU - Barry, Ian
AU - Richards, Toby
AU - Elbasty, Ahmed
AU - Moore, Hayley
AU - Bajwa, Adnan
AU - Duncan, Andrew
AU - Batchelder, Andrew
AU - Vanias, Tryfon
AU - Brown, Matthew
AU - Yap, Trixie
AU - Green, Lucy
AU - Smith, George
AU - Hurst, Katherine
AU - Rodriguez, Daniel U.
AU - Schofield, Ella
AU - Danbury, Hannah
AU - Wallace, Tom
AU - Forsyth, James
AU - Stimpson, Amy
AU - Hopkins, Luke
AU - Mohiuddin, Kamran
AU - Nandhra, Sandip
AU - Mohammadi-Zaniani, Ghazaleh
AU - Tigkiropoulos, Konstantinos
AU - Cowan, Andrew
AU - Perrott, Claire
AU - Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) Study Group
N1 - Published under an Elsevier User Licence: https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/open-access-licenses/elsevier-user-license
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to develop and internally validate risk prediction models for predicting groin wound surgical site infections (SSIs) following arterial intervention and to evaluate the utility of existing risk prediction models for this outcome. Methods: Data from the Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) multicentre cohort study were used. The GIVE study prospectively enrolled 1 039 consecutive patients undergoing an arterial procedure through 1 339 groin incisions. An overall SSI rate of 8.6% per groin incision, and a deep/organ space SSI rate of 3.8%, were reported. Eight independent predictors of all SSIs, and four independent predictors of deep/organ space SSIs were included in the development and internal validation of two risk prediction models. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify relevant risk prediction models for their evaluation. Results: The “GIVE SSI risk prediction model” (“GIVE SSI model”) and the “GIVE deep/organ space SSI risk prediction model” (“deep SSI model”) had adequate discrimination (C statistic 0.735 and 0.720, respectively). Three other groin incision SSI risk prediction models were identified; both GIVE risk prediction models significantly outperformed these other risk models in this cohort (C statistic 0.618 – 0.629; p < .050 for inferior discrimination in all cases). Conclusion: Two models were created and internally validated that performed acceptably in predicting “all” and “deep” groin SSIs, outperforming current existing risk prediction models in this cohort. Future studies should aim to externally validate the GIVE models.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to develop and internally validate risk prediction models for predicting groin wound surgical site infections (SSIs) following arterial intervention and to evaluate the utility of existing risk prediction models for this outcome. Methods: Data from the Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) multicentre cohort study were used. The GIVE study prospectively enrolled 1 039 consecutive patients undergoing an arterial procedure through 1 339 groin incisions. An overall SSI rate of 8.6% per groin incision, and a deep/organ space SSI rate of 3.8%, were reported. Eight independent predictors of all SSIs, and four independent predictors of deep/organ space SSIs were included in the development and internal validation of two risk prediction models. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify relevant risk prediction models for their evaluation. Results: The “GIVE SSI risk prediction model” (“GIVE SSI model”) and the “GIVE deep/organ space SSI risk prediction model” (“deep SSI model”) had adequate discrimination (C statistic 0.735 and 0.720, respectively). Three other groin incision SSI risk prediction models were identified; both GIVE risk prediction models significantly outperformed these other risk models in this cohort (C statistic 0.618 – 0.629; p < .050 for inferior discrimination in all cases). Conclusion: Two models were created and internally validated that performed acceptably in predicting “all” and “deep” groin SSIs, outperforming current existing risk prediction models in this cohort. Future studies should aim to externally validate the GIVE models.
KW - Groin wound
KW - Surgical site infection
KW - Vascular
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109465395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34246547
AN - SCOPUS:85109465395
VL - 62
SP - 258
EP - 266
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
SN - 1078-5884
IS - 2
ER -