Guidance on conducting and reviewing systematic reviews (and meta-analyses) in work and organizational psychology

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

24 Citations (Scopus)
44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are means of summarizing and synthesizing research evidence in a given topic area. They can be used to define the current state of knowledge and how confident we can be in that knowledge, to identify evidence gaps, and to provide recommendations for policy and practice based on the best available evidence. At European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, our editorial stance is explicitly to encourage the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The purpose of this editorial is to provide some guidance to authors and journal referees on the (technical) features of good systematic reviews.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date14 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Systematic review method
  • Work and organizational psychology
  • Evidence based decision making

Cite this