TY - JOUR
T1 - Health visitors' perception of their role in the universal childhood immunisation programme and their communication strategies with parents
AU - Redsell, Sarah A.
AU - Bedford, Helen
AU - Siriwardena, A. Niroshan
AU - Collier, Jacqueline
AU - Atkinson, Philippa
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Aim: This study explored health visitors’ perception of their role in the universal childhood
immunisation programme with particular emphasis on influencing factors and communication
strategies. Background: The majority of parents’ consent to immunisation, but
some find decision-making in this area difficult and have unmet information needs. In the
United Kingdom, health visitors routinely provide immunisation information for parents,
whereas general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses tend to administer vaccines and
respond to parents/carers’ questions. Research has investigated health professionals’ views
and knowledge about immunisation, but less is understood about health visitors’ role and
how they communicate with parents. Method: Following the Local Research Ethics and
Research Governance permissions, all health visitors (n5120) working in one county in the
United Kingdom were invited to participate in the study. Semistructured interviews (n522)
were undertaken using a prompt guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic
analysis using an iterative approach was used to explore the data facilitated by NVIVOTM
software. Findings: Five themes emerged from the interviews. These were health visitors’
professional role; identity and perceived barriers and communication strategies, parents’
right to choose, confidence in measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination and communicating
with migrant families about immunisation. There were differences between the
health visitors in their perceptions of their roles, skills and knowledge and communication
strategies. Health visitors perceived that GPs and practice nurses took a paternalistic
approach to the provision of immunisation information, while they used a parental decisionmaking
model. Health visitors reported a loss of professional confidence following the MMR
crisis. Conclusion: Given the evidence that some parents find it difficult to gain the information
they need about immunisation and health visitors’ acknowledgement that their usual
communication models were not effective during the MMR crisis, we feel specific communication
skills training is needed to enable health professionals to provide parents with
appropriate decision support.
AB - Aim: This study explored health visitors’ perception of their role in the universal childhood
immunisation programme with particular emphasis on influencing factors and communication
strategies. Background: The majority of parents’ consent to immunisation, but
some find decision-making in this area difficult and have unmet information needs. In the
United Kingdom, health visitors routinely provide immunisation information for parents,
whereas general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses tend to administer vaccines and
respond to parents/carers’ questions. Research has investigated health professionals’ views
and knowledge about immunisation, but less is understood about health visitors’ role and
how they communicate with parents. Method: Following the Local Research Ethics and
Research Governance permissions, all health visitors (n5120) working in one county in the
United Kingdom were invited to participate in the study. Semistructured interviews (n522)
were undertaken using a prompt guide. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic
analysis using an iterative approach was used to explore the data facilitated by NVIVOTM
software. Findings: Five themes emerged from the interviews. These were health visitors’
professional role; identity and perceived barriers and communication strategies, parents’
right to choose, confidence in measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination and communicating
with migrant families about immunisation. There were differences between the
health visitors in their perceptions of their roles, skills and knowledge and communication
strategies. Health visitors perceived that GPs and practice nurses took a paternalistic
approach to the provision of immunisation information, while they used a parental decisionmaking
model. Health visitors reported a loss of professional confidence following the MMR
crisis. Conclusion: Given the evidence that some parents find it difficult to gain the information
they need about immunisation and health visitors’ acknowledgement that their usual
communication models were not effective during the MMR crisis, we feel specific communication
skills training is needed to enable health professionals to provide parents with
appropriate decision support.
U2 - 10.1017/S1463423609990284
DO - 10.1017/S1463423609990284
M3 - Article
VL - 11
SP - 51
EP - 60
JO - Primary Health Care Research and Development
JF - Primary Health Care Research and Development
IS - 1
ER -