Abstract
The article examines the enduring popularity of a form of school history which
is based predominantly on the idea that the transmission of a positive story about the
national past will inculcate in young people a sense of loyalty to the state; a reassuring and
positive sense of identity and belonging; and a sense of social solidarity with fellow
citizens. England is one of the countries which has to at least some extent moved away
from this model of school history; but the past few years have seen suggestions for a move
back to a history curriculum which focuses predominantly on the transmission of
‘Our Island Story’; and which presents a positive rendering of that story. The history
curriculum in England is currently under review; and public pronouncements by
politicians; academic historians and newspaper editorials suggest strong pressures towards
a restoration of what is often termed ‘traditional’ school history; which was prevalent in
English schools before the advent of what has been termed ‘New history’ in the 1970s.
The paper questions some of the arguments which have been put forward in order to justify
a return to a history curriculum based on a positive and unproblematic narrative of the
national story and suggests that such a course of action is based on some unexamined
assumptions and a limited understanding of pedagogy and learning. The final section of the
paper outlines several weaknesses and flaws in the arguments for reverting to a traditional
(i.e. ‘nation-based’ and celebratory) form of school history; and some of the dangers
inherent in such a project.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 276-289 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Education Sciences |
Volume | 2012 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- socialisation
- nation state
- humanities education
- citizenship
- curriculum
- history teaching