TY - JOUR
T1 - Hume's non-instrumental and non-propositional decision theory
AU - Sugden, R.
PY - 2006/11/1
Y1 - 2006/11/1
N2 - Hume is often read as proposing an instrumental theory of decision, in which an agent's choices are rational if they maximally satisfy her desires, given her beliefs. In fact, Hume denies that rationality can be attributed to actions. I argue that this is not a gap needing to be filled. Hume's theory provides a coherent and self-contained understanding of action, compatible with current developments in experimental psychology and behavioural economics. On Hume's account, desires are primitive psychological motivations which do not have propositional content, and so are not subject to the criteria of rational consistency which apply to propositions.
AB - Hume is often read as proposing an instrumental theory of decision, in which an agent's choices are rational if they maximally satisfy her desires, given her beliefs. In fact, Hume denies that rationality can be attributed to actions. I argue that this is not a gap needing to be filled. Hume's theory provides a coherent and self-contained understanding of action, compatible with current developments in experimental psychology and behavioural economics. On Hume's account, desires are primitive psychological motivations which do not have propositional content, and so are not subject to the criteria of rational consistency which apply to propositions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845387159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0266267106001027
DO - 10.1017/S0266267106001027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33845387159
VL - 22
SP - 365
EP - 391
JO - Economics and Philosophy
JF - Economics and Philosophy
SN - 0266-2671
IS - 3
ER -