Abstract
In ‘Strategic Justice’, Vanderschraaf argues that many existing theories of justice as mutual advantage, including Hume’s, are not ‘proper accounts of justice’ because they deny the benefits of justice to people who are unable to contribute to the cooperative surplus. Vanderschraaf presents a model in which a practice of giving aid to vulnerable people can be a convention, and argues that this exemplifies justice as mutual advantage. I argue that this convention is not mutually advantageous. According to Hume’s theory, it creates moral obligations of humanity but not of justice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1719–1729 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 178 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 11 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2021 |
Keywords
- Hume
- Vanderschraaf
- vulnerability objection
- justice as mutual advantage
Profiles
-
Robert Sugden
- School of Economics - Professor of Economics
- Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science - Member
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Behavioural Economics - Member
- Economic Theory - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research