TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions recommended by national toolkits in primary and secondary healthcare sectors in England: TARGET and Start Smart Then Focus
AU - Ashiru-Oredope, D.
AU - Budd, E. L.
AU - Bhattacharya, A.
AU - Din, N.
AU - McNulty, C. A. M.
AU - Micallef, C.
AU - Ladenheim, D.
AU - Beech, E.
AU - Murdan, S.
AU - Hopkins, S.
AU - Brown, Nicholas
AU - Brown, Brian
AU - Carter, Sue
AU - Chadborn, Tim
AU - Charlett, Andre
AU - Cichowska, Anna
AU - Dobra, Stephen
AU - Eckford, Susan
AU - Faulding, Sue
AU - Gallagher, Rose
AU - Geoghegan, Lourda
AU - Gurney, Lene
AU - Heginbothom, Maggie
AU - Ironmonger, Dean
AU - Johnson, Alan
AU - Moore, Michael
AU - Morrow, Kate
AU - Patel, Bharat
AU - Pinder, Richard
AU - Puleston, Richard
AU - Richman, Colin
AU - Robotham, Julie
AU - Seal, Richard
AU - Sharland, Mike
AU - Stephens, Pete
AU - Stokle, Liz
AU - Underhill, Jonathan
AU - Warner, Bruce
AU - Watson, John
AU - West, Tony
AU - Whitney, Laura
AU - Wight, Ailsa
AU - Wiuff, Camilla
AU - Woodford, Neil
AU - Young, Tony
AU - on behalf of the English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR)
N1 - Funding Information:
D. A.-O. and S. H. are affiliated with the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). S. H. is also affiliated with the NIHR HPRU in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford. C. M. has received funding to attend conferences from Astellas, Gilead, Pfizer and Novartis, and educational grants from Pfizer and Novartis. All other authors: none to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2016.
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - Objectives: To assess and compare the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions recommended within the national AMS toolkits, TARGET and Start Smart Then Focus, in English primary and secondary healthcare settings in 2014, to determine the prevalence of cross-sector engagement to drive AMS interventions and to propose next steps to improve implementation of AMS. Methods: Electronic surveys were circulated to all 211 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs; primary sector) and to 146 (out of the 159) acute trusts (secondary sector) in England. Response rates were 39% and 63% for the primary and secondary sectors, respectively. Results: The majority of CCGs and acute trusts reported reviewing national AMS toolkits formally or informally (60% and 87%, respectively). However, only 13% of CCGs and 46% of acute trusts had developed an action plan for the implementation of these toolkits. Only 5% of CCGs had antimicrobial pharmacists in post; however, the role of specialist antimicrobial pharmacists continued to remain embedded within acute trusts, with 83% of responding trusts having an antimicrobial pharmacist at a senior grade. Conclusions: The majority of healthcare organizations review national AMS toolkits; however, implementation of the toolkits, through the development of action plans to deliver AMS interventions, requires improvement. For the first time, we report the extent of cross-sector and multidisciplinary collaboration to deliver AMS interventions in both primary and secondary care sectors in England. Results highlight that further qualitative and quantitative work is required to explore mutual benefits and promote best practice. Antimicrobial pharmacists remain leaders for implementing AMS interventions across both primary and secondary healthcare sectors.
AB - Objectives: To assess and compare the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions recommended within the national AMS toolkits, TARGET and Start Smart Then Focus, in English primary and secondary healthcare settings in 2014, to determine the prevalence of cross-sector engagement to drive AMS interventions and to propose next steps to improve implementation of AMS. Methods: Electronic surveys were circulated to all 211 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs; primary sector) and to 146 (out of the 159) acute trusts (secondary sector) in England. Response rates were 39% and 63% for the primary and secondary sectors, respectively. Results: The majority of CCGs and acute trusts reported reviewing national AMS toolkits formally or informally (60% and 87%, respectively). However, only 13% of CCGs and 46% of acute trusts had developed an action plan for the implementation of these toolkits. Only 5% of CCGs had antimicrobial pharmacists in post; however, the role of specialist antimicrobial pharmacists continued to remain embedded within acute trusts, with 83% of responding trusts having an antimicrobial pharmacist at a senior grade. Conclusions: The majority of healthcare organizations review national AMS toolkits; however, implementation of the toolkits, through the development of action plans to deliver AMS interventions, requires improvement. For the first time, we report the extent of cross-sector and multidisciplinary collaboration to deliver AMS interventions in both primary and secondary care sectors in England. Results highlight that further qualitative and quantitative work is required to explore mutual benefits and promote best practice. Antimicrobial pharmacists remain leaders for implementing AMS interventions across both primary and secondary healthcare sectors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965049998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jac/dkv492
DO - 10.1093/jac/dkv492
M3 - Article
C2 - 26869693
AN - SCOPUS:84965049998
VL - 71
SP - 1408
EP - 1414
JO - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
JF - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
SN - 0305-7453
IS - 5
ER -