Abstract
Objective: To investigate how people with communication and understanding difficulties, associated with conditions such as dementia, autism and intellectual disability, are represented in research guidance supplementary to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA: 2005) in England and Wales.
Methods: A documentary survey was conducted. The sample comprised the MCA Code of Practice (CoP: 2007) and 14 multi-authored advisory documents that were publicly available on the Health Research Authority website. Textual review of key words was conducted followed by summative content analysis.
Results: Representation of people with communication and understanding difficulties was confined to procedural information and position statements that focused mainly on risk management and protection. Whilst a need to engage potential participants was recognised, guidance provided was imprecise.
Conclusions: Tensions exist between the protection versus empowerment of people with communication and understanding difficulties in research. The development of structured, evidence-based guidance is indicated.
Patient or public contribution: People with communication and understanding difficulties and carers participated in a working group to explore, discuss and interpret the findings.
Methods: A documentary survey was conducted. The sample comprised the MCA Code of Practice (CoP: 2007) and 14 multi-authored advisory documents that were publicly available on the Health Research Authority website. Textual review of key words was conducted followed by summative content analysis.
Results: Representation of people with communication and understanding difficulties was confined to procedural information and position statements that focused mainly on risk management and protection. Whilst a need to engage potential participants was recognised, guidance provided was imprecise.
Conclusions: Tensions exist between the protection versus empowerment of people with communication and understanding difficulties in research. The development of structured, evidence-based guidance is indicated.
Patient or public contribution: People with communication and understanding difficulties and carers participated in a working group to explore, discuss and interpret the findings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 152-164 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Health Expectations |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 27 Nov 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2021 |
Keywords
- Code of Practice
- Mental Capacity Act
- capacity
- communication
- consent
- ethics
Profiles
-
Karen Bunning
- School of Health Sciences - Professor
- Mental Health and Social Care - Member
- Rehabilitation - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching and Research
-
Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences - Associate Professor
- Mental Health and Social Care - Member
- Dementia & Complexity in Later Life - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching and Research