Institutional accountability of nonstate actors in the UNFCCC: Exit, voice, and loyalty

Jonathan Kuyper, Karin Bäckstrand, Heike Schroeder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How are nonstate actors within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) held to account? In this article, we introduce the concept of “institutional accountability” to complement the wider literature(s) on accountability in climate governance. Within institutional frameworks, actors employ rules, norms, and procedures to demand justifications from one another. In light of those justifications, actors then use “exit, voice, or loyalty” to positively or negatively sanction each other. To depict the dynamics of institutional accountability, we analyze the role of nonstate actors in the nine constituency groups of the UNFCCC. We outline the constituency structure and the population of observer organizations. We then identify examples where nonstate actors employed institutional rules in tandem with exit, voice, or loyalty to foster accountability. In making this analysis we draw upon three years of on-site participation at UNFCCC meetings, document analysis, and more than 40 semi-structured interviews with state and nonstate actors. We conclude by discussing the scope and conditions under which institutional accountability may occur in other issue areas of global governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88–109
Number of pages22
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date28 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • civil society
  • climate change
  • governance
  • accountability
  • nonstate actors

Cite this