Abstract
This paper analyzes overlapping-generations models where natural capital is owned by selfish agents. Transfers in favor of young agents reduce the rate of depletion and increase output growth. It is shown that intergenerational transfers may be preferred to laissez-faire by an indefinite sequence of generations: if the resource share in production is sufficiently high, the welfare gain induced by preservation compensates for the loss due to taxation. This conclusion is reinforced when other assets are available, e.g. man-made capital, claims on monopoly rents, and R&D investment. Transfers raise the welfare of all generations, except that of the first resource owner: if resource endowments are taxed at time zero, all successive generations support resource-saving policies for purely selfish reasons.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 53-78 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Environment and Development Economics |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 1 Feb 2008 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2008 |