International expert consensus on surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mohammad Kermansaravi, Islam Omar, Nicholas Finer, Carel Le Roux, Miguel A. Carbajo, David Sarwer, Luca Busetto, Jaime Ponce, Jennifer Logue, Helen M. Parretti, Mary O’Kane, Shahab Shahabi, Kamlesh Khunti, Alexandra I. Blakemore, Erik Stenberg, Sally Abbott, Aayed Alqahtani, Ali Aminian, Bassem Amr, Jose M. BalibreaRachel L. Batterham, Estuardo Behrens, Deepak L. Bhatt, Paul Chesworth, Pradeep Chowbey, Ken Clare, Manoel Galvao Neto, Yitka Graham, Ramen Goel, Wasim Hanif, Miguel F. Herrera, Kazunori Kasama, Radwan Kassir, Filip K. Knop, Shanu N. Kothari, Jon A. Kristinsson, Barbara McGowan, Andrew McKechnie, Karl Miller, Alex D. Miras, John Morton, Jane Ogden, Ralph Peterli, Jonathan H. Pinkney, Dimitri Pournaras, Sjaak Pouwels, Gerhard Prager, Paulina Salminen, Mireille J. Serlie, Asim Shabbir, Rishi Singhal, Shahrad Taheri, Abd A. Tahrani, Rudolf Weiner, Scott A. Shikora, Kamal Mahawar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been an established treatment option for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but there is a relative paucity of evidence-based guidelines on preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations concerning metabolic surgery for T2DM patients. To address this gap, we initiated a Delphi consensus process with a diverse group of international multidisciplinary experts. Method: We embarked on a Delphi consensus-building exercise to propose an evidence-based expert consensus covering various aspects of MBS in patients with T2DM. We defined the scope of the exercise and proposed statements and surveyed the literature through electronic databases. The literature summary and voting process were conducted by 52 experts, who evaluated 44 statements. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: Consensus, defined as > 80% agreement, was reached for 43 out of 44 statements. The experts reached an agreement on the nature, terminology, and mechanisms of action of MBS. The currently available scores for predicting remission of T2DM after surgery are not robust enough for routine clinical use, and there is a need for further research to enable more personalized treatment. Additionally, they agreed that metabolic surgery for T2DM is cost-effective, and MBS procedures for treating T2DM vary in their safety and efficacy. Conclusion: This Delphi expert consensus statement guides clinicians on various aspects of metabolic surgery for T2DM and also grades the quality of the available evidence for each of the proposed statements.

Original languageEnglish
Article number151
JournalBMC Endocrine Disorders
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Metabolic Surgery
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cite this