Intuition-talk: Virus or virtue?

James Andow

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The word ‘intuition’ is used frequently both in philosophy and in discussions about philosophical methods. It has been argued that this intuition-talk makes no (clear) semantic contribution and that intuition-talk is thus a bad habit that ought to be abandoned. I urge caution in making this inference. There are many pragmatic roles intuition-talk might play. Moreover, according to one plausible story (for which there is some empirical support), there is reason to think intuition-talk is actually a good habit for philosophers to have.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-531
Number of pages9
JournalPhilosophia
Volume45
Issue number2
Early online date22 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Philosophical methods
  • Intuition
  • Hedging
  • Metaphilosophy
  • Epistemic humility
  • Intellectual humility

Access to Document

  • Published manuscript

    This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    Final published version, 445 KBLicence: CC BY

    Cite this