Abstract
Photographs published in the Mail Online of Musician Paul Weller and his young children taken in the street in California were subject to a misuse of private information and breach of Data Protection Act claim against Associated Newspapers Limited. In the Court of Appeal's judgment a number of matters were given consideration, including the application of Californian law, where it was lawful to both take and publish the photographs; whether the claimants had a reasonable expectation of privacy; the relevance of the status of the child and the extent to which matters such as consent play a role. In outlining these issues the case emphasises a need for more clarity on both the taking and publishing of photographs – in relation to the famous and their children, and to children in general.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17-31 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Media Law |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Jul 2016 |
Keywords
- photographs
- privacy
- children
- image rights
- consent