Projects per year
Restricting the international supply of fossil fuels is increasingly acknowledged as a necessary part of achieving long-term global temperature goals. However, the barriers to imposing such restrictions are immense. Issues of economic stability, equity, and associated geo-political tensions, are particularly acute. In theory, a managed decline can be facilitated by international cooperation. In practice, however, despite some apparent rhetorical commitments, adequate institutional responses have not been forthcoming. This paper highlights potentially relevant institutions, and assesses their combined contribution to fulfilling a set of governance functions relevant to decarbonisation in this case. The analysis finds that the governance challenges associated with deciding what fossil fuel carbon should be designated ‘unburnable’, and managing the associated equity-related, geo-political conflicts, are far from being fully recognised. Potential institutional reforms, by which governance gaps could be narrowed, are identified. These highlight the further potential of the G20, UNFCCC and WTO in particular.
|Journal||Earth System Governance|
|Early online date||1 Oct 2020|
|Publication status||Published - Jun 2021|
- School of Environmental Sciences - Research Fellow
- Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research - Member
- Environmental Social Sciences - Member
- Science, Society and Sustainability - Member
Person: Research & Analogous, Research Group Member
- 1 Finished
COP21: Results and Implications for Pathways and Policies for Low Emissions European Societies
Demailly, D., Rayner, T., Anger-Kraavi, A. & Jordan, A.
1/12/16 → 31/01/20