Liberal warfare: A crusade twice removed

David Hughes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)


    Since the 1990s, liberal warfare has attracted a good deal of debate and commentary, virtually all of which has been framed in the secular language of rights, sovereignty, power, and legitimacy. This article, in contrast, makes religion its central analytic category. Treating liberalism as a political religion, it argues that, insofar as liberal wars are fought primarily to uphold “universal” Western values, their motivation has something in common with medieval crusades. But, because that universalist ideal is vitiated by the self-interest of states, liberal wars in fact bear closer resemblance to anachronistic attempts to revive the crusading ideal in the late Middle Ages. Thus, they represent a distant,
    secularized echo of a pale imitation of the Crusades—or “a crusade twice removed.”
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)351-373
    Number of pages23
    JournalInternational Studies Review
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Sep 2013


    • Liberal Warfare
    • Humanitarian Intervention
    • Responsibility to Protect
    • Crusades
    • Political Religion

    Cite this