TY - GEN
T1 - Mapping Weaponised Victimhood: A Machine Learning Approach
AU - Butcher, Samantha
AU - De La Iglesia, Beatriz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
PY - 2025/10/22
Y1 - 2025/10/22
N2 - Political discourse frequently leverages group identity and moral alignment, with weaponised victimhood (WV) standing out as a powerful rhetorical strategy. Dominant actors employ WV to frame themselves or their allies as victims, thereby justifying exclusionary or retaliatory political actions. Despite advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP), existing computational approaches struggle to capture such subtle rhetorical framing at scale, especially when alignment is implied rather than explicitly stated. This paper introduces a dual-task framework designed to address this gap by linking Named Entity Recognition (NER) with a nuanced rhetorical positioning classification (positive, negative, or neutral - POSIT). By treating rhetorical alignment as a structured classification task tied to entity references, our approach moves beyond sentiment-based heuristics to yield a more interpretable and fine-grained analysis of political discourse. We train and compare transformer-based models (BERT, DistilBERT, RoBERTa) across Single-Task, Multi-Task, and Task-Conditioned Multi-Task Learning architectures. Our findings demonstrate that NER consistently outperformed rhetorical positioning, achieving higher F1-scores and distinct loss dynamics. While single-task learning showed wide loss disparities (e.g., BERT NER 0.45 vs POSIT 0.99), multi-task setups fostered more balanced learning, with losses converging across tasks. Multi-token rhetorical spans proved challenging but showed modest F1 gains in integrated setups. Neutral positioning remained the weakest category, though targeted improvements were observed. Models displayed greater sensitivity to polarised language (e.g., RoBERTa TC-MTL reaching 0.55 F1 on negative spans). Ultimately, entity-level F1 scores converged (NER: 0.60–0.61; POSIT: 0.50–0.52), suggesting increasingly generalisable learning and reinforcing multitask modelling as a promising approach for decoding complex rhetorical strategies in real-world political language.
AB - Political discourse frequently leverages group identity and moral alignment, with weaponised victimhood (WV) standing out as a powerful rhetorical strategy. Dominant actors employ WV to frame themselves or their allies as victims, thereby justifying exclusionary or retaliatory political actions. Despite advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP), existing computational approaches struggle to capture such subtle rhetorical framing at scale, especially when alignment is implied rather than explicitly stated. This paper introduces a dual-task framework designed to address this gap by linking Named Entity Recognition (NER) with a nuanced rhetorical positioning classification (positive, negative, or neutral - POSIT). By treating rhetorical alignment as a structured classification task tied to entity references, our approach moves beyond sentiment-based heuristics to yield a more interpretable and fine-grained analysis of political discourse. We train and compare transformer-based models (BERT, DistilBERT, RoBERTa) across Single-Task, Multi-Task, and Task-Conditioned Multi-Task Learning architectures. Our findings demonstrate that NER consistently outperformed rhetorical positioning, achieving higher F1-scores and distinct loss dynamics. While single-task learning showed wide loss disparities (e.g., BERT NER 0.45 vs POSIT 0.99), multi-task setups fostered more balanced learning, with losses converging across tasks. Multi-token rhetorical spans proved challenging but showed modest F1 gains in integrated setups. Neutral positioning remained the weakest category, though targeted improvements were observed. Models displayed greater sensitivity to polarised language (e.g., RoBERTa TC-MTL reaching 0.55 F1 on negative spans). Ultimately, entity-level F1 scores converged (NER: 0.60–0.61; POSIT: 0.50–0.52), suggesting increasingly generalisable learning and reinforcing multitask modelling as a promising approach for decoding complex rhetorical strategies in real-world political language.
KW - BERT
KW - Entity Framing
KW - Multi-Task Learning
KW - Named Entity Recognition
KW - Natural Language Processing
KW - Political Discourse
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022478374
U2 - 10.5220/0013673600004000
DO - 10.5220/0013673600004000
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105022478374
T3 - International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, IC3K - Proceedings
SP - 216
EP - 223
BT - 17th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, KDIR 2025 as part of IC3K 2025 - Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management
A2 - Coenen, Frans
A2 - Nolle, Lars
A2 - Aveiro, David
A2 - Fernandez-Breis, Jesualdo
A2 - Masciari, Elio
A2 - Gruenwald, Le
A2 - Bernardino, Jorge
A2 - Torres, Ricardo
PB - Science and Technology Publications, Lda
T2 - 17th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, KDIR 2025 as part of 17th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, IC3K 2025
Y2 - 22 October 2025 through 24 October 2025
ER -