TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement tools for mental health problems and mental well-being in people with severe or profound intellectual disabilities: A systematic review
AU - Flynn, Samantha
AU - Vereenooghe, Leen
AU - Hastings, Richard P.
AU - Adams, Dawn
AU - Cooper, Sally-Ann
AU - Gore, Nick
AU - Hatton, Chris
AU - Hood, Kerry
AU - Jahoda, Andrew
AU - Langdon, Peter E.
AU - McNamara, Rachel
AU - Oliver, Chris
AU - Roy, Ashok
AU - Totsika, Vasiliki
AU - Waite, Jane
N1 - Role of funding sources: This review was funded by the Baily Thomas Charitable Fund (Reference number: TRUST/RNA/AC/SG/3543/6297), and was sponsored by the University of Warwick (Reference number: REGO-2015-1605).
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Mental health problems affect people with intellectual disabilities (ID) at rates similar to or in excess of the non-ID population. People with severe ID are likely to have persistent mental health problems. In this systematic review (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015024469), we identify and evaluate the methodological quality of available measures of mental health problems or well-being in individuals with severe or profound ID. Electronic searches of ten databases identified relevant publications. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts of retrieved records (n = 41,232) and full-text articles (n = 573). Data were extracted and the quality of included papers was appraised. Thirty-two papers reporting on 12 measures were included. Nine measures addressed a broad spectrum of mental health problems, and were largely observational. One physiological measure of well-being was included. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped Scale-II and Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire are reliable measures in this population. However, the psychometric properties of six other measures were only considered within a single study – indicating a lack of research replication. Few mental health measures are available for people with severe or profound ID, particularly lacking are tools measuring well-being. Assessment methods that do not rely on proxy reports should be explored further.
AB - Mental health problems affect people with intellectual disabilities (ID) at rates similar to or in excess of the non-ID population. People with severe ID are likely to have persistent mental health problems. In this systematic review (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015024469), we identify and evaluate the methodological quality of available measures of mental health problems or well-being in individuals with severe or profound ID. Electronic searches of ten databases identified relevant publications. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts of retrieved records (n = 41,232) and full-text articles (n = 573). Data were extracted and the quality of included papers was appraised. Thirty-two papers reporting on 12 measures were included. Nine measures addressed a broad spectrum of mental health problems, and were largely observational. One physiological measure of well-being was included. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped Scale-II and Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire are reliable measures in this population. However, the psychometric properties of six other measures were only considered within a single study – indicating a lack of research replication. Few mental health measures are available for people with severe or profound ID, particularly lacking are tools measuring well-being. Assessment methods that do not rely on proxy reports should be explored further.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85027395771&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.006
M3 - Review article
VL - 57
SP - 32
EP - 44
JO - Clinical Psychology Review
JF - Clinical Psychology Review
SN - 0272-7358
ER -