Abstract
We present evidence of crowding out of intrinsic motivation in real purchasing decisions from a field experiment in a large supermarket chain. We compare three instruments, a label, a subsidy and a neutral price change, in their ability to induce consumers to switch from dirty to clean products. Interestingly a subsidy framed as an intervention is less effective than either a label or a neutrally framed price change. We argue that this provides a new explanation for crowding behaviour: consumers are resistant to having the line of demarcation between public and private decision making moved - in either direction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 592-607 |
Journal | Economic Inquiry |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 7 Jun 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2014 |