Abstract
We present evidence of crowding out of intrinsic motivation in real purchasing decisions from a field experiment in a large supermarket chain. We compare three instruments, a label, a subsidy and a neutral price change, in their ability to induce consumers to switch from dirty to clean products. Interestingly a subsidy framed as an intervention is less effective than either a label or a neutrally framed price change. We argue that this provides a new explanation for crowding behaviour: consumers are resistant to having the line of demarcation between public and private decision making moved - in either direction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 592-607 |
| Journal | Economic Inquiry |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 7 Jun 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2014 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver