Abstract
In this paper, we consider the Leveson inquiry's use of a narrative device – the policy cycle – to justify the need for a break with the past. We challenge that narrative, which runs through much of the literature, and posit a more nuanced and complex account of the politics and history of press inquiries, drawing upon the political science literature. We then reflect upon the implications of our findings for the future of press regulation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 248–278 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | Legal Studies |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 15 Dec 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
Profiles
-
John Street
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Emeritus Professor
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Cultural Politics, Communications & Media - Member
- Policy & Politics - Member
- Political, Social and International Studies - Member
Person: Honorary, Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research