National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, social values and healthcare priority setting

Peter Littlejohns, Kalipso Chalkidou, Anthony J. Culyer, Albert Weale, Annette Rid, Katharina Kieslich, Clare Coultas, Catherine Max, Jill Manthorpe, Benedict Rumbold, Victoria Charlton, Helen Roberts, Ruth Faden, James Wilson, Carleigh Krubiner, Polly Michell, Gry Wester, Jennifer A. Whitty, Selena Knight

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)


On 1 April 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence was 20 years old. This is an anniversary worth noting, if for no other reason than how remarkable it is for a National Health Service quango (quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation) to be still standing two decades after its inception. There are more reasons for marking and celebrating the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s 20-year run. In the intervening years, the Institute has done much to advance the health of the UK population. It has achieved an international reputation for robust and fair healthcare prioritisation that is widely viewed as setting the global standard. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence built this reputation not only through the rigorous development and application of scientific methods to guide its work but also through its efforts to articulate the underpinning social and ethical values that provide its decisions with robust justification. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s reputation also rests on its commitment to transparency, accountability and inclusiveness in facilitating public and patient input in its deliberations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-179
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Issue number5
Early online date2 Apr 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Cite this