Abstract
This article provides a critical examination of the contribution that statecraft theory, which has been subject to recent revision and development, makes to the literature on institutional change. It articulates an emergent neo-statecraft approach that offers an agent-led form of historical institutionalism. This overcomes the common criticism that historical institutionalists underplay the creative role of actors. The article also argues that the approach brings back into focus the imperatives of electoral politics as a source of institutional change and provides a macro theory of change which is also commonly missing from historical institutionalist work. It can therefore identify previously unnoticed sources of stability and change, especially in states with strong executives and top-down political cultures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 84-110 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Government and Opposition |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 01 |
Early online date | 17 Jul 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
Profiles
-
Toby James
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Professor of Politics & Public Policy
- Policy & Politics - Member
- Political, Social and International Studies - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching & Research