TY - JOUR
T1 - Net primary productivity estimates and environmental variables in the Arctic Ocean: An assessment of coupled physical-biogeochemical models
AU - Lee, Younjoo J.
AU - Matrai, Patricia A.
AU - Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M.
AU - Saba, Vincent S.
AU - Aumont, Olivier
AU - Babin, Marcel
AU - Buitenhuis, Erik T.
AU - Chevallier, Matthieu
AU - de Mora, Lee
AU - Dessert, Morgane
AU - Dunne, John P.
AU - Ellingsen, Ingrid
AU - Feldman, Doron
AU - Frouin, Robert
AU - Gehlen, Marion
AU - Gorgues, Thomas
AU - Ilyina, Tatiana
AU - Jin, Meibing
AU - John, Jasmin G.
AU - Lawrence, Jonathan
AU - Manizza, Manfredi
AU - Menkes, Christophe Eugène
AU - Perruche, Coralie
AU - Le Fouest, Vincent
AU - Popova, Ekaterina
AU - Romanou, Anastasia
AU - Schwinger, Jörg
AU - Séférian, Roland
AU - Stock, Charles A.
AU - Tjiputra, Jerry
AU - Bruno Tremblay, L.
AU - Ueyoshi, Kyozo
AU - Vichi, Marcello
AU - Yool, Andrew
AU - Zhang, Jinlun
AU - Samuelsen, Annette
N1 -
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - The relative skill of 21 regional and global biogeochemical models was assessed in terms of how well the models reproduced observed net primary productivity (NPP) and environmental variables such as nitrate concentration (NO3), mixed layer depth (MLD), euphotic layer depth (Zeu), and sea ice concentration, by comparing results against a newly updated, quality-controlled in situ NPP database for the Arctic Ocean (1959-2011). The models broadly captured the spatial features of integrated NPP (iNPP) on a pan-Arctic scale. Most models underestimated iNPP by varying degrees in spite of overestimating surface NO3, MLD, and Zeu throughout the regions. Among the models, iNPP exhibited little difference over sea ice condition (ice-free vs. ice-influenced) and bottom depth (shelf vs. deep ocean). The models performed relatively well for the most recent decade and towards the end of Arctic summer. In the Barents and Greenland Seas, regional model skill of surface NO3 was best associated with how well MLD was reproduced. . Regionally, iNPP was relatively well simulated in the Beaufort Sea and the central Arctic Basin, where in situ NPP is low and nutrients are mostly depleted. Models performed less well at simulating iNPP in the Greenland and Chukchi Seas, despite the higher model skill in MLD and sea ice concentration, respectively. iNPP model skill was constrained by different factors in different Arctic Ocean regions. Our study suggests that better parameterization of biological and ecological microbial rates (phytoplankton growth and zooplankton grazing) are needed for improved Arctic Ocean biogeochemical modeling.
AB - The relative skill of 21 regional and global biogeochemical models was assessed in terms of how well the models reproduced observed net primary productivity (NPP) and environmental variables such as nitrate concentration (NO3), mixed layer depth (MLD), euphotic layer depth (Zeu), and sea ice concentration, by comparing results against a newly updated, quality-controlled in situ NPP database for the Arctic Ocean (1959-2011). The models broadly captured the spatial features of integrated NPP (iNPP) on a pan-Arctic scale. Most models underestimated iNPP by varying degrees in spite of overestimating surface NO3, MLD, and Zeu throughout the regions. Among the models, iNPP exhibited little difference over sea ice condition (ice-free vs. ice-influenced) and bottom depth (shelf vs. deep ocean). The models performed relatively well for the most recent decade and towards the end of Arctic summer. In the Barents and Greenland Seas, regional model skill of surface NO3 was best associated with how well MLD was reproduced. . Regionally, iNPP was relatively well simulated in the Beaufort Sea and the central Arctic Basin, where in situ NPP is low and nutrients are mostly depleted. Models performed less well at simulating iNPP in the Greenland and Chukchi Seas, despite the higher model skill in MLD and sea ice concentration, respectively. iNPP model skill was constrained by different factors in different Arctic Ocean regions. Our study suggests that better parameterization of biological and ecological microbial rates (phytoplankton growth and zooplankton grazing) are needed for improved Arctic Ocean biogeochemical modeling.
KW - Arctic Ocean
KW - net primary productivity
KW - model skill assessment
KW - nutrients
KW - coupled physical-biogeochemical models
KW - Earth System Models
U2 - 10.1002/2016JC011993
DO - 10.1002/2016JC011993
M3 - Article
VL - 121
SP - 8635
EP - 8669
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research - Oceans
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research - Oceans
SN - 2169-9275
IS - 12
ER -