TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonprogressive behavioural frontotemporal dementia
T2 - Recent developments and clinical implications of the 'bvFTD phenocopy syndrome'
AU - Kipps, Christopher M.
AU - Hodges, John R.
AU - Hornberger, Michael
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW:The clinical features of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are well established; however, recent work has identified patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for the disease who do not appear to progress clinically. This review describes means of distinguishing this group at an early stage from patients who are likely to deteriorate. RECENT FINDINGS:Despite indistinguishable clinical profiles, studies in a cohort of bvFTD patients showed a particularly good prognosis in a subgroup of predominantly male patients in whom initial structural imaging was normal. This could not be explained by differences in disease duration, and was confirmed by subsequent PET studies. Retrospective review of clinical data in these groups verified that the current clinical diagnostic criteria are both insensitive to true progressive bvFTD, particularly in the early stages, and also poorly specific. In contrast, measures of activity of daily living performance, executive function and tests of social cognition appear to have better discriminatory value for patients who show clear clinical progression, with many individual diagnoses verified by post mortem examination in this group. SUMMARY:It remains doubtful that the nonprogressive group have a neurodegenerative disease. The implication for the current clinical diagnostic criteria and their proposed revision is discussed.
AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW:The clinical features of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are well established; however, recent work has identified patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for the disease who do not appear to progress clinically. This review describes means of distinguishing this group at an early stage from patients who are likely to deteriorate. RECENT FINDINGS:Despite indistinguishable clinical profiles, studies in a cohort of bvFTD patients showed a particularly good prognosis in a subgroup of predominantly male patients in whom initial structural imaging was normal. This could not be explained by differences in disease duration, and was confirmed by subsequent PET studies. Retrospective review of clinical data in these groups verified that the current clinical diagnostic criteria are both insensitive to true progressive bvFTD, particularly in the early stages, and also poorly specific. In contrast, measures of activity of daily living performance, executive function and tests of social cognition appear to have better discriminatory value for patients who show clear clinical progression, with many individual diagnoses verified by post mortem examination in this group. SUMMARY:It remains doubtful that the nonprogressive group have a neurodegenerative disease. The implication for the current clinical diagnostic criteria and their proposed revision is discussed.
KW - diagnosis
KW - frontotemporal dementia
KW - imaging
KW - neuropsychology
KW - phenocopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649634120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283404309
DO - 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283404309
M3 - Article
C2 - 20962637
AN - SCOPUS:78649634120
VL - 23
SP - 628
EP - 632
JO - Current Opinion in Neurology
JF - Current Opinion in Neurology
SN - 1350-7540
IS - 6
ER -