Norwich COVID-19 testing initiative pilot: evaluating the feasibility of asymptomatic testing on a university campus

Tara Berger Gillam, Jennifer Cole, Karim Gharbi, Emily Angiolini, Tom Barker, Peter Bickerton, Thomas Brabbs, Jeannette Chin, Enrico Coen, Sarah Cossey, Robert P. Davey, Rosemary Davidson, Alex Durrant, Dylan Edwards, Neil Hall, Suzanne Henderson, Mark Hitchcock, Naomi Irish, James Lipscombe, Greg JonesGerard Parr, Stuart Rushworth, Neil Shearer, Russell Smith, Nicholas Steel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)


Background: There is a high prevalence of COVID-19 in university-age students, who are returning to campuses. There is little evidence regarding the feasibility of universal, asymptomatic testing to help control outbreaks in this population. This study aimed to pilot mass COVID-19 testing on a university research park, to assess the feasibility and acceptability of scaling up testing to all staff and students.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional feasibility study on a university research park in the East of England. All staff and students (5,625) were eligible to participate. All participants were offered 4 PCR swabs, which they self- administered over two weeks. Outcome measures included: uptake; drop-out rate; positivity rates; participant acceptability measures; laboratory processing measures; data collection and management measures.

Results: 798 (76%) of 1053 who registered provided at least one swab. 687 (86%) provided all four. 792 (99%) of 798 who submitted at least one swab had all negative results. 6 participants had one inconclusive result. There were no positive results. 458 (57%) of 798 participants responded to a post-testing survey, demonstrating a mean acceptability score of 4.51/5, with 5 being the most positive.

Conclusions: Repeated self-testing for COVID-19 using PCR is feasible and acceptable to a university population.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-88
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health
Issue number1
Early online date30 Oct 2020
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Cite this