Abstract
The dominant view in academic and policy arenas is increasingly one in which the major contribution of capture fisheries to development should be derived from the capacity of society to maximise the economic rent of fishery resources. Drawing upon empirical experience from the South, this article highlights the potentially disastrous consequences that a universal implementation of the rent-maximisation model would have in developing countries, and argues that a more gradual approach would be preferable. The welfare function of small-scale fisheries, namely, their capacities to provide labour and cash income to resource-poor households, should be preserved until the appropriate macroeconomic conditions for rent-maximisation and redistribution are fulfilled.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 325-358 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Development Policy Review |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Poverty reduction
- common pool resources
- safety nets
- economic development
- labour buffer
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver