Abstract
Indirect comparison methods have been increasingly used to assess the effectiveness of different interventions comparatively. This study evaluated a Trial Similarity and Evidence Consistency Assessment (TSECA) framework for assessing key assumptions underlying the validity of indirect comparisons.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 184-191 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 66 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2013 |
Keywords
- Bias (Epidemiology)
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Guideline Adherence
- Humans
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Quality Assurance, Health Care
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Reproducibility of Results
- Sensitivity and Specificity