Recent reforms saw the introduction of a parody exception into UK copyright law, and current debate calls for a similar parody exception in EU trade mark law. This article evaluates why there is a need for such specific exception and why recital 25 of the recast Trade Marks Directive might be insufficient. Despite the generally commercial nature of trade marks, a closer analysis reveals that trade marks owners’ rights have expanded to cover expressive uses of signs, including parody. The introduction of an exception allowing registered trade marks to be parodied would re-balance the protection afforded to signs to ensure that trade marks owners may still exercise their rights, but without causing disproportionate harm to the exercise of freedom of expression.
|European Intellectual Property Review
|Published - 1 Jul 2016
- School of Law - Associate Professor, Honorary Associate Professor
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Competition, Markets and Regulation - Member
- Media, Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law - Group Lead
Person: Other related - academic, Honorary, Research Group Member, Research Centre Member