Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for a home or clinic based program of chronic heart failure management: Findings from the Which? trial

  • Jennifer A. Whitty
  • , Simon Stewart
  • , Melinda J. Carrington
  • , Alicia Calderone
  • , Thomas Marwick
  • , John D. Horowitz
  • , Henry Krum
  • , Patricia M. Davidson
  • , Peter S. Macdonald
  • , Christopher Reid
  • , Paul A. Scuffham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Beyond examining their overall cost-effectiveness and mechanisms of effect, it is important to understand patient preferences for the delivery of different modes of chronic heart failure management programs (CHF-MPs). We elicited patient preferences around the characteristics and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a clinic or home-based CHF-MP. Methodology/Principal Findings A Discrete Choice Experiment was completed by a sub-set of patients (n = 91) enrolled in the WHICH? trial comparing home versus clinic-based CHF-MP. Participants provided 5 choices between hypothetical clinic and home-based programs varying by frequency of nurse consultations, nurse continuity, patient costs, and availability of telephone or education support. Participants (aged 71±13 yrs, 72.5% male, 25.3% NYHA class III/IV) displayed two distinct preference classes. A latent class model of the choice data indicated 56% of participants preferred clinic delivery, access to group CHF education classes, and lower cost programs (p<0.05). The remainder preferred home-based CHF-MPs, monthly rather than weekly visits, and access to a phone advice service (p<0.05). Continuity of nurse contact was consistently important. No significant association was observed between program preference and participant allocation in the parent trial. WTP was estimated from the model and a dichotomous bidding technique. For those preferring clinic, estimated WTP was ≈AU$9-20 per visit; however for those preferring home-based programs, WTP varied widely (AU$15-105). Conclusions/Significance Patient preferences for CHF-MPs were dichotomised between a home-based model which is more likely to suit older patients, those who live alone, and those with a lower household income; and a clinic-based model which is more likely to suit those who are more socially active and wealthier. To optimise the delivery of CHF-MPs, health care services should consider their patients’ preferences when designing CHF-MPs.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere58347
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2013

Cite this