TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study
AU - van Kleef, Ellen
AU - Frewer, Lynn J.
AU - Chrysochoidis, Georgios
AU - Houghton, Julie
AU - Korzen-Bohr, Sara
AU - Krystallis, Thanassis
AU - Lassen, Jesper
AU - Pfenning, Uwe
AU - Rowe, Gene
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - In designing and implementing appropriate foodriskmanagement strategies, it is important to examine how key stakeholders perceive both the practice and effectiveness of foodriskmanagement. The objective of this study is to identify similarities and differences in perceptions of, and attitudes to, foodriskmanagement practices held by consumers and experts with an interest in food safety. Focus groups were conducted in five European countries chosen for their (hypothesised) cultural differences in attitudes towards risk: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Slovenia and the UK. Content analysis was carried out on the resulting texts and (sub) categories were identified within the analysis framework to facilitate the capture of emerging themes. Five key themes were identified as common to the perceptions of both consumers and experts, although these are not represented in the same way by both groups. These key themes are: (1) efforts made by the responsible authorities to manage foodrisks; (2) responsibility for prevention and management of foodrisks; (3) how priorities are established within regulatory systems; (4) scientific progress and its implications for foodriskmanagement; and (5) media attention and food safety incidents. Although some similarities emerged between the groups, differences were also identified. For example, experts appeared to be highly negative about media influences, whereas consumers appeared more indifferent about media influences and motives. These different perspectives need to be addressed in order to reduce the perceptual distance between key stakeholders, and in particular, to enhance consumer confidence in the foodriskmanagement system. Based on the study findings, recommendations for foodriskmanagement policies are outlined.
AB - In designing and implementing appropriate foodriskmanagement strategies, it is important to examine how key stakeholders perceive both the practice and effectiveness of foodriskmanagement. The objective of this study is to identify similarities and differences in perceptions of, and attitudes to, foodriskmanagement practices held by consumers and experts with an interest in food safety. Focus groups were conducted in five European countries chosen for their (hypothesised) cultural differences in attitudes towards risk: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Slovenia and the UK. Content analysis was carried out on the resulting texts and (sub) categories were identified within the analysis framework to facilitate the capture of emerging themes. Five key themes were identified as common to the perceptions of both consumers and experts, although these are not represented in the same way by both groups. These key themes are: (1) efforts made by the responsible authorities to manage foodrisks; (2) responsibility for prevention and management of foodrisks; (3) how priorities are established within regulatory systems; (4) scientific progress and its implications for foodriskmanagement; and (5) media attention and food safety incidents. Although some similarities emerged between the groups, differences were also identified. For example, experts appeared to be highly negative about media influences, whereas consumers appeared more indifferent about media influences and motives. These different perspectives need to be addressed in order to reduce the perceptual distance between key stakeholders, and in particular, to enhance consumer confidence in the foodriskmanagement system. Based on the study findings, recommendations for foodriskmanagement policies are outlined.
KW - food safety
KW - consumer perceptions
KW - expert views
KW - lay-expert differences
KW - food risk management
KW - risk analysis
KW - consumers
KW - trust
KW - Denmark
KW - Germany
KW - Greece
KW - Slovenia
KW - United Kingdom
U2 - 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.002
M3 - Article
VL - 47
SP - 46
EP - 63
JO - Appetite
JF - Appetite
SN - 0195-6663
IS - 1
ER -