TY - JOUR
T1 - Persistent Genomic Erosion in Whooping Cranes Despite Demographic Recovery
AU - Fontsere, Claudia
AU - Speak, Samuel A.
AU - Caven, Andrew J.
AU - Rodríguez, Juan Antonio
AU - Wang, Xuejing
AU - Pacheco, Carolina
AU - Cassatt-Johnstone, Molly
AU - Femerling, Georgette
AU - Maloney, Brigid
AU - Balacco, Jennifer
AU - Collins, Joanna
AU - Sims, Ying
AU - Abueg, Linelle
AU - Fedrigo, Olivier
AU - Jarvis, Erich D.
AU - Hartup, Barry K.
AU - Shapiro, Beth
AU - Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
AU - van Oosterhout, Cock
AU - Morales, Hernán E.
N1 - Data Availability Statement:
All raw data generated in this study has been uploaded to the EuropeanNucleotide Archive (ENA; Accession no. PRJEB80530). The metadataof these samples can be found in Table S2. Code for data analysis canbe accessed through GitHub: https://github.com/claudefa/ WhoopingCrane_ genomics, https://github.com/pollicipes/ROHbin and https://github.com/saspeak/LoadLift.
PY - 2025/12/8
Y1 - 2025/12/8
N2 - Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality reference genome, and re-sequencing 16 historical (years 1867–1893) and 37 modern (2007–2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive-bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its historical genetic diversity and has increased its inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realised load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and persistent effects of historical inbreeding (i.e., background inbreeding) argue against the species' downlisting from its current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild-captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realised load. Our findings emphasise the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.
AB - Integrating in-situ (wild) and ex-situ (captive) conservation efforts can mitigate genetic diversity loss and help prevent extinction of endangered wild populations. The whooping crane (Grus americana) experienced severe population declines in the 18th century, culminating in a collapse to ~20 individuals by 1944. Legal protections and conservation actions have since increased the census population from a stock of 16 individuals to approximately 840 individuals, yet the impact on genomic diversity remains unclear. We analysed the temporal dynamics of genomic erosion by sequencing a high-quality reference genome, and re-sequencing 16 historical (years 1867–1893) and 37 modern (2007–2020) genomes, including wild individuals and four generations of captive-bred individuals. Genomic demographic reconstructions reveal a steady decline, accelerating over the past 300 years with the European settlement of North America. Temporal genomic analyses show that despite demographic recovery, the species has lost 70% of its historical genetic diversity and has increased its inbreeding. Although the modern population bottleneck reduced the ancestral genetic load, modern populations possess more realised load than masked load, possibly resulting in a chronic loss of fitness. Integrating pedigree and genomic data, we underscore the role of breeding management in reducing recent inbreeding. Yet ongoing heterozygosity loss, load accumulation, and persistent effects of historical inbreeding (i.e., background inbreeding) argue against the species' downlisting from its current Endangered status on the IUCN Red List and the Endangered Species Act. The presence of private genetic variation in wild and captive populations suggests that wild-captive crosses could enhance genetic diversity and reduce the realised load. Our findings emphasise the role of genomics in informing conservation management and policy.
KW - captive breeding
KW - conservation genetics
KW - genomic erosion
KW - population genetics—empirical
KW - whooping crane
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014121129
U2 - 10.1111/mec.70088
DO - 10.1111/mec.70088
M3 - Article
C2 - 40856093
AN - SCOPUS:105014121129
SN - 0962-1083
VL - 34
JO - Molecular Ecology
JF - Molecular Ecology
IS - 23
M1 - e70088
ER -