TY - JOUR
T1 - Policy principles for sustainable and just land systems
AU - Garrett, Rachael
AU - Meyfroidt, Patrick
AU - de Bremond, Ariane
AU - Wartenberg, Ariani
AU - Barbieri, Lindsay
AU - Fernández-Llamazares, Álvaro
AU - Acheampong, Emmanuel
AU - Addoah, Thomas
AU - Adeleye, Matthew
AU - Alexander, Peter
AU - Brandão, Joyce
AU - Coomes, David Anthony
AU - Ellis, Erle C.
AU - Fajardo, J.
AU - Jacobi, Johanna
AU - Leach, Melissa
AU - Lele, Sharachchandra
AU - Zonta, Aymara Llanque
AU - Lyons-White, Joss
AU - Martin, Adrian
AU - Messerli, Peter
AU - Milner-Gulland, E. J.
AU - Müller, Daniel
AU - Mills, Morena
AU - Kalunda, Pauline Nantongo
AU - Pascual, Unai
AU - Rueda, Ximena
AU - Ryan, Casey
AU - Setty, Siddappa
AU - Pham, Thu Thuy
AU - Zagaria, Cecilia
N1 - Data accessibility: Supplementary material is available online: Garrett R et al.. 2025 Supplementary material from: Policy roadmap for sustainable and just land systems. Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8047775).
PY - 2025/10/15
Y1 - 2025/10/15
N2 - Land systems are the nexus of many global sustainability and justice challenges. Here we present eight guiding principles (P1–8) for improved land system policies following the heuristic stages of a policy cycle. The principles are as follows: embrace recognitional justice (P1), be politically strategic (P2), consider multiple policy goals (P3), address systemic issues (P4), take an integrative scope (P5), foster co-development (P6), adopt clear and monitorable targets (P7) and integrate diagnostic and adaptive capacities (P8). We then explore how well policies align with these principles in two globally relevant cases (land-based climate mitigation and biodiversity-friendly agriculture). In both cases, we find that when policies align poorly with the principles at the agenda-setting stage, there is further misalignment at the policy formulation stage. In the instances when recognitional justice is embraced at the onset, policies subsequently integrate more diverse goals and co-development, but they insufficiently consider political strategy and struggle to handle system complexity. Nonetheless, we identify promising policy mixes that provide benefits to multiple actors, integrate multiple goals, take an integrative scope and have strong monitoring and adaptation, aligning well with multiple principles. Further investigation of these principles could reveal promising policy pathways for land systems.
AB - Land systems are the nexus of many global sustainability and justice challenges. Here we present eight guiding principles (P1–8) for improved land system policies following the heuristic stages of a policy cycle. The principles are as follows: embrace recognitional justice (P1), be politically strategic (P2), consider multiple policy goals (P3), address systemic issues (P4), take an integrative scope (P5), foster co-development (P6), adopt clear and monitorable targets (P7) and integrate diagnostic and adaptive capacities (P8). We then explore how well policies align with these principles in two globally relevant cases (land-based climate mitigation and biodiversity-friendly agriculture). In both cases, we find that when policies align poorly with the principles at the agenda-setting stage, there is further misalignment at the policy formulation stage. In the instances when recognitional justice is embraced at the onset, policies subsequently integrate more diverse goals and co-development, but they insufficiently consider political strategy and struggle to handle system complexity. Nonetheless, we identify promising policy mixes that provide benefits to multiple actors, integrate multiple goals, take an integrative scope and have strong monitoring and adaptation, aligning well with multiple principles. Further investigation of these principles could reveal promising policy pathways for land systems.
KW - governance
KW - science–policy
KW - sustainability transitions
KW - conservation
KW - climate
KW - food
KW - transformation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018790692
U2 - 10.1098/rsos.250810
DO - 10.1098/rsos.250810
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105018790692
SN - 2054-5703
VL - 12
JO - Royal Society Open Science
JF - Royal Society Open Science
IS - 10
M1 - 250810
ER -