Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Potential pathways to acute food systems crisis in the UK

  • Sarah Bridle
  • , Elta Smith
  • , Aled Jones
  • , Vanessa Pilley
  • , Saher Hasnain
  • , Lucy Stanbrough
  • , Christina Vogel
  • , Caitlin Douglas
  • , Bob Doherty
  • , Philip Tovey
  • , Pete Smith
  • , Simon Pearson
  • , S.J Beard
  • , Neil Ward
  • , Dan Crossley
  • , H. Charles J. Godfray
  • , Monika Zurek
  • , Julie Pierce
  • , Dominic Watters
  • , Davide Natalini
  • Tim G. Benton, Riaz Bhunnoo, Ben Dare, Juan Pablo Cordero, Molly Watson, Barnaby Coupe, Judith Batchelar, Ella Taylor, John R. Ingram, June Irons, Tim Lang, Tom Macmillan, Daniel Morton, Sue Pritchard, Angelina Sanderson Bellamy, Eike Sindlinger, Alec Taylor, Kerry Whiteside

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There is increasing concern in many advanced economies about the risks of disruption and crises in agri-food systems. Government departments and non-governmental organisations are working to identify and understand specific risks but struggle to take broad, holistic perspectives and therefore underestimate the potential for civil unrest. In the interests of helping move from understanding to action, we convened a group of experts through a Delphi process to map out potential pathways to acute UK food system crises and identify interventions that would build resilience and sustainability. To this end, we consulted 31 experts, carrying out 15 expert interviews, followed by three surveys and two workshops with a further 16 experts. The experts highlighted the many existing chronic issues creating a tinderbox for an acute risk to lead to a food crisis in the UK. These
chronic issues include climate change, poor policy implementation, rising inequality, food supply chain consolidation and the risks from just-in-time supply of food. They voted to include three acute triggers—(a) cyber-attack, (b) a major extreme weather event and (c) a major new international conflict—and described how any combination of these could lead to (d) a UK food availability and/or price shock that could result in widespread fear of unsafe or inadequate food, leading to violence. A total of 7 system-wide interventions were prioritised to help address these pathway elements together and build sustainability, and a further 21 were identified to address elements individually.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1342
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalSustainability
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • cascading risks
  • climate change
  • ecological collapse
  • extreme weather
  • food systems
  • global catastrophic risk
  • scenarios

Cite this