Practicalities of HCR-20 implementation within secure psychiatric services

Peter Beazley, Amy Carter, Sarah-Jane Stewart, Julia Renton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The HCR-20 is established as the de-facto tool for the assessment of violence risk within forensic psychiatric services. Although much has been written about the value of the tool, less has been written about the practicalities of achieving meaningful completion of HCR-20 assessments at a service level. The present paper seeks to review recommendations within the literature and also those based upon the authors’ own experiences in HCR-20 implementation, reviewing a number of the common issues and barriers encountered within the development of a strategic, service-level, approach to completion of the HCR-20. Possible solutions to these problems are also considered. We conclude that although there is not necessarily a single approach that is right for every service, certain principles need to be followed to ensure high quality assessments. Further, we develop a number of ‘good practice points’ which will be useful for services considering this issue on a strategic level, as well as commissioners evaluating the quality of HCR-20 completion within services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-56
JournalJournal of Psychiatric Intensive Care
Volume13
Issue number1
Early online date13 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Keywords

  • HCR-20
  • audit
  • best practice guidance
  • clinical governance
  • risk assessment
  • violence

Cite this