Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of diffusional kurtosis (DK) imaging for distinguishing benign from malignant regions, as well as low- from high-grade malignant regions, within the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate in comparison with standard diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed consent. Forty-seven patients with prostate cancer underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging by using a pelvic phased-array coil and DW imaging (maximum b value, 2000 sec/mm2). Parametric maps were obtained for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); the metric DK (K), which represents non-Gaussian diffusion behavior; and corrected diffusion (D) that accounts for this non-Gaussianity. Two radiologists reviewed these maps and measured ADC, D, and K in sextants positive for cancer at biopsy. Data were analyzed by using mixed-model analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Seventy sextants exhibited a Gleason score of 6; 51 exhibited a Gleason score of 7 or 8. K was significantly greater in cancerous sextants than in benign PZ (0.96+/-0.24 vs 0.57+/-0.07, P.99). K exhibited significantly greater sensitivity for differentiating sextants with low- and high-grade cancer than ADC or D (68.6% vs 51.0% and 49.0%, respectively; P
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 126-135 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Radiology |
Volume | 264 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 1 May 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
Keywords
- Analysis of Variance
- Bayes Theorem
- Biopsy
- Diagnosis
- Differential
- Diffusion
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Feasibility Studies
- Humans
- Image Interpretation