Abstract
This article investigates and compares the changes to both the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Copyright Directive, through which Europe-an Union policymakers have sought to protect European content producers, mainly in the face of competition from US-based platforms. Contributing to debates about platform and content regulation, we examine the approaches taken with these two legislative changes and assess the potential for success of the most recent efforts. Ultimately, we argue that if revised as proposed the Copyright Directive runs the risk of further adding to the imbalance of power between press publishers and online platforms, and that the level playing field approach taken in the AVSMD revision is more likely to be at least somewhat effective in addressing that imbalance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 219-243 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of Media Law |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 Mar 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- AVMSD
- Copyright Directive
- content funding
- EU law
Profiles
-
Sally Broughton Micova
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Associate Professor in Communications, Policy & Politics
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- East Centre: UEA Centre for the Study of East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Space - Member
- Policy & Politics - Member
- Politics & International Relations - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research
-
Sabine Jacques
- School of Law - Honorary Associate Professor
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Competition, Markets and Regulation - Member
Person: Honorary, Research Group Member, Research Centre Member