Abstract
Expressions of disaffection with politics are often connected with criticism of the ways in which contemporary politicians speak and communicate. In this article I show how political speech is in part a product of the way in which a society organises and arranges communication institutionally, technologically and aesthetically. The art of rhetoric is most fundamentally concerned with how, in the midst of political dispute and contestation, political arguments may be made persuasive through their connection with the ‘common sense’ of audiences. This process enables a people to reflect on its beliefs and values and to assess their adequacy in particular circumstances. Decline in this art may be attributed to social and technological change but also, and above all, to the dominance of ideologies hostile to the concepts of ‘common sense’ and ‘common good’, and which privilege the arts of behaviour change and choice management over those of argument, debate and persuasion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 428–436 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | The Political Quarterly |
Volume | 85 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- rhetoric
- democracy
- British politics
- persuasion
- neoliberalism
- behaviour change
Profiles
-
Alan Finlayson
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Professor of Political & Social Theory
- Cultural Politics, Communications & Media - Member
- Policy & Politics - Member
- Political, Social and International Studies - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching & Research