TY - JOUR
T1 - Provocative AI: Beyond calm interactions
AU - Hargreaves, Tom
AU - Pereira, Vinicius J.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the GECKO Innovative Training Network. This project has received funding from the European Commission under Horizon 2020 MSCA-ITN-2020 Innovative Training Networks program under Grant 955422.
PY - 2023/10/6
Y1 - 2023/10/6
N2 - Whilst the uses and potential benefits of AI-enabled technologies are expanding, there is also increased recognition of their potential downsides. This short comment critiques approaches to AI-enabled technologies based around ‘calm computing’ for rendering both users and the technologies themselves as passive and thus doing little to challenge the unsustainable status quo. It highlights some recent efforts to develop more proactive forms of AI but argues that, whilst these may lend more agency to technologies, they do little to increase the agency of users or engage them in thinking more critically about the nature of contemporary inequalities and unsustainabilities. To move beyond this situation, it calls for new forms of experimentation around what might be termed “Provocative AI” technologies. Drawing on emerging speculative examples relating to gender inequality, energy, and surveillance, it suggests that, instead of minimising or solving problems for users, Provocative AI could instead work to create more actively engaged citizens by promoting deeper reflection on the nature of contemporary societal problems.
AB - Whilst the uses and potential benefits of AI-enabled technologies are expanding, there is also increased recognition of their potential downsides. This short comment critiques approaches to AI-enabled technologies based around ‘calm computing’ for rendering both users and the technologies themselves as passive and thus doing little to challenge the unsustainable status quo. It highlights some recent efforts to develop more proactive forms of AI but argues that, whilst these may lend more agency to technologies, they do little to increase the agency of users or engage them in thinking more critically about the nature of contemporary inequalities and unsustainabilities. To move beyond this situation, it calls for new forms of experimentation around what might be termed “Provocative AI” technologies. Drawing on emerging speculative examples relating to gender inequality, energy, and surveillance, it suggests that, instead of minimising or solving problems for users, Provocative AI could instead work to create more actively engaged citizens by promoting deeper reflection on the nature of contemporary societal problems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174921552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/MPRV.2023.3282819
DO - 10.1109/MPRV.2023.3282819
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 22
SP - 58
EP - 61
JO - IEEE Pervasive Computing
JF - IEEE Pervasive Computing
SN - 1536-1268
IS - 3
ER -