Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews: Letter to the Editor

M Petticrew, P Wilson, K Wright, F Song

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Access to Document

@article{08a816e0a05a439f8d26a85add503366,

title = "Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews: Letter to the Editor",

author = "M Petticrew and P Wilson and K Wright and F Song",

year = "2002",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.324.7336.545",

language = "English",

volume = "324",

pages = "545",

journal = "BMJ-British Medical Journal",

issn = "1759-2151",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "7336",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews

T2 - Letter to the Editor

AU - Petticrew, M

AU - Wilson, P

AU - Wright, K

AU - Song, F

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.545

DO - 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.545

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 324

SP - 545

JO - BMJ-British Medical Journal

JF - BMJ-British Medical Journal

SN - 1759-2151

IS - 7336

ER -