TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantile regression analysis reveals widespread evidence for gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia development
AU - Pozarickij, Alfred
AU - Williams, Cathy
AU - Hysi, Pirro G.
AU - Guggenheim, Jeremy A.
AU - Aslam, Tariq
AU - Barman, Sarah A.
AU - Barrett, Jenny H.
AU - Bishop, Paul
AU - Blows, Peter
AU - Bunce, Catey
AU - Carare, Roxana O.
AU - Chakravarthy, Usha
AU - Chan, Michelle
AU - Chua, Sharon Y.L.
AU - Crabb, David P.
AU - Cumberland, Philippa M.
AU - Day, Alexander
AU - Desai, Parul
AU - Dhillon, Bal
AU - Dick, Andrew D.
AU - Egan, Cathy
AU - Ennis, Sarah
AU - Foster, Paul
AU - Fruttiger, Marcus
AU - Gallacher, John E.J.
AU - Garway-Heath, David F.
AU - Gibson, Jane
AU - Gore, Dan
AU - Hammond, Chris J.
AU - Hardcastle, Alison
AU - Harding, Simon P.
AU - Hogg, Ruth E.
AU - Keane, Pearse A.
AU - Khaw, Sir Peng T.
AU - Khawaja, Anthony P.
AU - Lascaratos, Gerassimos
AU - Lotery, Andrew J.
AU - Mac Gillivray, Tom
AU - Mackie, Sarah
AU - Martin, Keith
AU - McGaughey, Michelle
AU - McGuinness, Bernadette
AU - McKay, Gareth J.
AU - McKibbin, Martin
AU - Mitry, Danny
AU - Moore, Tony
AU - Morgan, James E.
AU - Muthy, Zaynah A.
AU - O’Sullivan, Eoin
AU - Yates, Max M.
AU - UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium
PY - 2019/5/6
Y1 - 2019/5/6
N2 - A genetic contribution to refractive error has been confirmed by the discovery of more than 150 associated variants in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Environmental factors such as education and time outdoors also demonstrate strong associations. Currently however, the extent of gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that refractive error-associated variants exhibit effect size heterogeneity, a hallmark feature of genetic interactions. Of 146 variants tested, evidence of non-uniform, non-linear effects were observed for 66 (45%) at Bonferroni-corrected significance (P < 1.1 × 10−4) and 128 (88%) at nominal significance (P < 0.05). LAMA2 variant rs12193446, for example, had an effect size varying from −0.20 diopters (95% CI −0.18 to −0.23) to −0.89 diopters (95% CI −0.71 to −1.07) in different individuals. SNP effects were strongest at the phenotype extremes and weaker in emmetropes. A parsimonious explanation for these findings is that gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia are pervasive.
AB - A genetic contribution to refractive error has been confirmed by the discovery of more than 150 associated variants in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Environmental factors such as education and time outdoors also demonstrate strong associations. Currently however, the extent of gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that refractive error-associated variants exhibit effect size heterogeneity, a hallmark feature of genetic interactions. Of 146 variants tested, evidence of non-uniform, non-linear effects were observed for 66 (45%) at Bonferroni-corrected significance (P < 1.1 × 10−4) and 128 (88%) at nominal significance (P < 0.05). LAMA2 variant rs12193446, for example, had an effect size varying from −0.20 diopters (95% CI −0.18 to −0.23) to −0.89 diopters (95% CI −0.71 to −1.07) in different individuals. SNP effects were strongest at the phenotype extremes and weaker in emmetropes. A parsimonious explanation for these findings is that gene-environment or gene-gene interactions in myopia are pervasive.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071011090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s42003-019-0387-5
DO - 10.1038/s42003-019-0387-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071011090
VL - 2
JO - Communications Biology
JF - Communications Biology
SN - 2399-3642
IS - 1
M1 - 167
ER -