Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial

  • Akhil Kapur
  • , Roger J Hall
  • , Iqbal S Malik
  • , Ayesha C Qureshi
  • , Jeremy Butts
  • , Mark de Belder
  • , Andreas Baumbach
  • , Gianni Angelini
  • , Adam de Belder
  • , Keith G Oldroyd
  • , Marcus Flather
  • , Michael Roughton
  • , Petros Nihoyannopoulos
  • , Jens Peder Bagger
  • , Kenneth Morgan
  • , Kevin J Beatt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

435 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting against coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)432-40
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume55
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Feb 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary
  • Coronary Artery Bypass
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Diabetes Complications
  • Drug-Eluting Stents
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged

Cite this