Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass

Diego Perez de Arenaza, Belinda Lees, Marcus Flather, Fiona Nugara, Trygve Husebye, Marek Jasinski, Marek Cisowski, Mohammed Khan, Michael Henein, Jullien Gaer, Levant Guvendik, Andrzej Bochenek, Stanislaw Wos, Mons Lie, Guido Van Nooten, Dudley Pennell, John Pepper, ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. In response to the long-term results of aortic homografts, stentless porcine valves were introduced as an alternative low-resistance valve. We conducted a randomized trial comparing a stentless with a stented porcine valve in adults with severe aortic stenosis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2696-702
Number of pages7
JournalCirculation
Volume112
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2005

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Echocardiography
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organ Size
  • Patient Selection
  • Stents
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
  • Ventricular Function, Left

Cite this