TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid metagenomics for diagnosis of bloodstream and respiratory tract nosocomial infections: current status and future prospects
AU - Moragues-Solanas, Lluís
AU - Scotti, Riccardo
AU - O'Grady, Justin
N1 - Funding Information: L Moragues-Solanas is funded by the MRC Doctoral Antimicrobial Research Training (DART) Industrial CASE Programme. R Scotti is funded by Innovative UK grant number TS/S00887X/1. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)); this research was funded by the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Microbes in the Food Chain BB/R012504/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR10348, BBS/E/F/000PR10349, BBS/E/F/000PR10351.
PY - 2021/4/29
Y1 - 2021/4/29
N2 - Introduction: Nosocomial infections represent a major problem for the health-care systems worldwide. Currently, diagnosis relies on microbiological culture, which is slow and has poor sensitivity. While waiting for a diagnosis, patients are treated with empiric broad spectrum antimicrobials, which are often inappropriate for the infecting pathogen. This results in poor patient outcomes, poor antimicrobial stewardship and increased costs for health-care systems. Areas covered: Clinical metagenomics (CMg), the application of metagenomic sequencing for the diagnosis of infection, has the potential to become a viable alternative to culture that can offer rapid results with high accuracy. In this article, we review current CMg methods for the diagnosis of nosocomial bloodstream (BSI) and lower respiratory-tract infections (LRTI). Expert opinion: CMg approaches are more accurate in LRTI compared to BSI. This is because BSIs are caused by low pathogen numbers in a high background of human cells. To overcome this, most approaches focus on cell-free DNA, but, to date, these tests are not accurate enough yet to replace blood culture. The higher pathogen numbers in LRTI samples make this a more suitable for CMg and accurate approaches have been developed, which are likely to be implemented in hospitals within the next 2–5 years.
AB - Introduction: Nosocomial infections represent a major problem for the health-care systems worldwide. Currently, diagnosis relies on microbiological culture, which is slow and has poor sensitivity. While waiting for a diagnosis, patients are treated with empiric broad spectrum antimicrobials, which are often inappropriate for the infecting pathogen. This results in poor patient outcomes, poor antimicrobial stewardship and increased costs for health-care systems. Areas covered: Clinical metagenomics (CMg), the application of metagenomic sequencing for the diagnosis of infection, has the potential to become a viable alternative to culture that can offer rapid results with high accuracy. In this article, we review current CMg methods for the diagnosis of nosocomial bloodstream (BSI) and lower respiratory-tract infections (LRTI). Expert opinion: CMg approaches are more accurate in LRTI compared to BSI. This is because BSIs are caused by low pathogen numbers in a high background of human cells. To overcome this, most approaches focus on cell-free DNA, but, to date, these tests are not accurate enough yet to replace blood culture. The higher pathogen numbers in LRTI samples make this a more suitable for CMg and accurate approaches have been developed, which are likely to be implemented in hospitals within the next 2–5 years.
KW - Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
KW - Infection
KW - blood stream infection
KW - clinical metagenomics (CMg)
KW - diagnosis
KW - mNGS
KW - respiratory tract infection
KW - sepsis
KW - sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105386945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14737159.2021.1906652
DO - 10.1080/14737159.2021.1906652
M3 - Article
VL - 21
SP - 371
EP - 380
JO - Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
JF - Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
SN - 1473-7159
IS - 4
ER -