TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommender systems and supplier competition on platforms
AU - Fletcher, Amelia
AU - Ormosi, Peter L.
AU - Savani, Rahul
N1 - Funding Information: This work has benefited from a UKRI Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) Pump Priming grant EP/V00784X/1. The UKRI TAS Hub assembles a team from the Universities of Southampton, Nottingham and King’s College London. The Hub sits at the centre of the £33M Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Programme, funded by the UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund. Amelia Fletcher’s work was part-funded by EPSRC grant EP/T022493/1.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Digital platforms can offer a multiplicity of items in one place. This should, in principle, lower end-users’ search costs and improve their decision-making, and thus enhance competition between suppliers using the platform. But end-users struggle with large choice sets. Recommender systems (RSs) can help by predicting end-users’ preferences and suggesting relevant products. However, this process of prediction can generate systemic biases in the recommendations made, including popularity bias, incumbency bias, homogeneity bias, and conformity bias. The nature and extent of these biases will depend on the choice of RS model design, the data feeding into the RS model, and feedback loops between these two elements. We discuss how these systemic biases might be expected to worsen end-user choices and harm competition between suppliers. They can increase concentration, barriers to entry and expansion, market segmentation, and prices while reducing variety and innovation. This can happen even when a platform’s interests are broadly aligned with those of end-users, and the situation may be worsened where these incentives diverge. We outline these important effects at a high level, with the objective to highlight the competition issues arising, including policy implications, and to motivate future research.
AB - Digital platforms can offer a multiplicity of items in one place. This should, in principle, lower end-users’ search costs and improve their decision-making, and thus enhance competition between suppliers using the platform. But end-users struggle with large choice sets. Recommender systems (RSs) can help by predicting end-users’ preferences and suggesting relevant products. However, this process of prediction can generate systemic biases in the recommendations made, including popularity bias, incumbency bias, homogeneity bias, and conformity bias. The nature and extent of these biases will depend on the choice of RS model design, the data feeding into the RS model, and feedback loops between these two elements. We discuss how these systemic biases might be expected to worsen end-user choices and harm competition between suppliers. They can increase concentration, barriers to entry and expansion, market segmentation, and prices while reducing variety and innovation. This can happen even when a platform’s interests are broadly aligned with those of end-users, and the situation may be worsened where these incentives diverge. We outline these important effects at a high level, with the objective to highlight the competition issues arising, including policy implications, and to motivate future research.
KW - Algorithmic Bias
KW - Digital Platforms
KW - Entry Barriers
KW - Recommender Systems
KW - Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177044276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/joclec/nhad009
DO - 10.1093/joclec/nhad009
M3 - Article
VL - 19
SP - 397
EP - 426
JO - Journal of Competition Law and Economics
JF - Journal of Competition Law and Economics
SN - 1744-6414
IS - 3
ER -