TY - JOUR
T1 - Reimagining dementia care: A complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom
AU - Papavasiliou, Evie
AU - Marshall, Jessica
AU - Allan, Louise
AU - Bradbury, Katherine
AU - Fox, Chris
AU - Hawkes, Matthew
AU - Irvine, Anne
AU - Moniz-Cook, Esme
AU - Pick, Aimee
AU - Polley, Marie
AU - Rathbone, Amy
AU - Reeve, Joanne
AU - Robinson, Dame Louise
AU - Rook, George
AU - Sadler, Euan
AU - Wolverson, Emma
AU - Walker, Sarah
AU - Cross, Jane
AU - SPLENDID Collaboration
N1 - Data Availability Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Introduction: Dementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex needs, exacerbated by social isolation and difficulty accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) has been increasingly integrated into the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) as a means to connect individuals with non-clinical services to address these challenges. However, current research provides limited detail on specific SP interventions tailored to dementia care, leaving gaps in understanding the targeted needs, participation drivers, effectiveness and potential benefits for PLWD. Methods: A complex intervention systematic review of SP in dementia care was performed in the United Kingdom using an iterative logic model approach. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching for reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using Gough's Evidence of Framework. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Results: Forty-nine studies, reporting on PLWD, met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that SP for PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and lacks focus, reflecting the diverse demographics involved. Interventions encompass cognitive, educational, psychosocial, physical, community and complementary therapies, of inconsistent classification, with some being umbrella interventions and others standalone services. Provided by the NHS, charities and integrated services, SP involves a range of referrers and connectors. Finally, individual outcomes show benefits such as increased independence and improved mood, but challenges pertaining to suitability and logistical issues, whereas systemic outcomes include cost savings and better service delivery, despite high implementation costs. Conclusion: SP pathways for PLWD are varied, with success relying heavily on adequately resourced and trained connectors. While benefits extend beyond health improvements, further research is needed to assess long-term impacts, refine mechanisms and standardise evaluation metrics for SP effectiveness in dementia care. Patient and Public Contributions: A PPI advisory group, consisting of a person living with dementia and a caregiver, was actively involved throughout the review process, providing insights into the review questions, the logic model, emerging findings and interpretation of results.
AB - Introduction: Dementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex needs, exacerbated by social isolation and difficulty accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) has been increasingly integrated into the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) as a means to connect individuals with non-clinical services to address these challenges. However, current research provides limited detail on specific SP interventions tailored to dementia care, leaving gaps in understanding the targeted needs, participation drivers, effectiveness and potential benefits for PLWD. Methods: A complex intervention systematic review of SP in dementia care was performed in the United Kingdom using an iterative logic model approach. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching for reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using Gough's Evidence of Framework. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Results: Forty-nine studies, reporting on PLWD, met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that SP for PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and lacks focus, reflecting the diverse demographics involved. Interventions encompass cognitive, educational, psychosocial, physical, community and complementary therapies, of inconsistent classification, with some being umbrella interventions and others standalone services. Provided by the NHS, charities and integrated services, SP involves a range of referrers and connectors. Finally, individual outcomes show benefits such as increased independence and improved mood, but challenges pertaining to suitability and logistical issues, whereas systemic outcomes include cost savings and better service delivery, despite high implementation costs. Conclusion: SP pathways for PLWD are varied, with success relying heavily on adequately resourced and trained connectors. While benefits extend beyond health improvements, further research is needed to assess long-term impacts, refine mechanisms and standardise evaluation metrics for SP effectiveness in dementia care. Patient and Public Contributions: A PPI advisory group, consisting of a person living with dementia and a caregiver, was actively involved throughout the review process, providing insights into the review questions, the logic model, emerging findings and interpretation of results.
KW - dementia care
KW - health services
KW - people living with dementia
KW - primary care
KW - social prescribing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004907514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/hex.70289
DO - 10.1111/hex.70289
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40356285
AN - SCOPUS:105004907514
SN - 1369-6513
VL - 28
JO - Health Expectations
JF - Health Expectations
IS - 3
M1 - e70289
ER -