Resisting the long arm of criminal antitrust laws: Norris v The United States

Peter Whelan

doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00743.x

Resisting the long arm of criminal antitrust laws: Norris v The United States

Peter Whelan

School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This note analyses the judgment of the House of Lords in the case Norris v USA, and argues that its ruling on whether mere price-fixing can amount to a common law conspiracy to defraud will have a significant effect on both US and UK criminal anti-cartel enforcement. In particular, the potential negative impact of the judgment on the future viability of the UK Cartel Offence is highlighted.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	272-283
Number of pages	12
Journal	Modern Law Review
Volume	72
Issue number	2
Early online date	20 Feb 2009
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00743.x
Publication status	Published - Mar 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00743.x

Cite this

@article{008a99899d934f3ea55dc3c7bb0d6c6b,

title = "Resisting the long arm of criminal antitrust laws: Norris v The United States",

abstract = "This note analyses the judgment of the House of Lords in the case Norris v USA, and argues that its ruling on whether mere price-fixing can amount to a common law conspiracy to defraud will have a significant effect on both US and UK criminal anti-cartel enforcement. In particular, the potential negative impact of the judgment on the future viability of the UK Cartel Offence is highlighted.",

author = "Peter Whelan",

year = "2009",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00743.x",

language = "English",

volume = "72",

pages = "272--283",

journal = "Modern Law Review",

issn = "1468-2230",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resisting the long arm of criminal antitrust laws: Norris v The United States

AU - Whelan, Peter

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - This note analyses the judgment of the House of Lords in the case Norris v USA, and argues that its ruling on whether mere price-fixing can amount to a common law conspiracy to defraud will have a significant effect on both US and UK criminal anti-cartel enforcement. In particular, the potential negative impact of the judgment on the future viability of the UK Cartel Offence is highlighted.

AB - This note analyses the judgment of the House of Lords in the case Norris v USA, and argues that its ruling on whether mere price-fixing can amount to a common law conspiracy to defraud will have a significant effect on both US and UK criminal anti-cartel enforcement. In particular, the potential negative impact of the judgment on the future viability of the UK Cartel Offence is highlighted.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00743.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00743.x

M3 - Article

SN - 1468-2230

VL - 72

SP - 272

EP - 283

JO - Modern Law Review

JF - Modern Law Review

IS - 2

ER -