Abstract
This paper critically reviews the three main approaches to land degradation and conservation - the classic, populist and neo-liberal. The implications of these paradigm shifts are examined in terms of research needs. Next, the paper discusses the role of science and technology, and the origins and substance of differences in the perception, evaluation and diagnosis of degradation. Focus is then shifted to analyzing how farmers and pastoralists make decisions about resource use and management, and a research approach is suggested for analyzing decision-making. Two case studies illustrate the approach - Nepal and Zimbabwe
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | World Bank Group |
| Number of pages | 139 |
| Volume | 289 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 1995 |
Publication series
| Name | World Bank Discussion Papers |
|---|---|
| Publisher | United Nations Publications |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver