Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation

Aled Jones; Sarah Bridle; Katherine Denby; Riaz Bhunnoo; Daniel Morton; Lucy Stanbrough; Barnaby Coupe; Vanessa Pilley; Tim Benton; Pete Falloon; Tom K. Matthews; Saher Hasnain; John S. Heslop-Harrison; Simon Beard; Julie Pierce; Jules Pretty; Monika Zurek; Alexandra Johnstone; Pete Smith; Neil Gunn; Molly Watson; Edward Pope; Asaf Tzachor; Caitlin Douglas; Christian Reynolds; Neil Ward; Jez Fredenburgh; Clare Pettinger; Tom Quested; Juan Pablo Cordero; Clive Mitchell; Carrie Bewick; Cameron Brown; Christopher Brown; Paul J. Burgess; Andy Challinor; Andrew Cottrell; Thomas Crocker; Thomas George; Charles J. Godfray; Rosie S. Hails; John Ingram; Tim Lang; Fergus Lyon; Simon Lusher; Tom MacMillan; Sue Newton; Simon Pearson; Sue Pritchard; Dale Sanders; Angelina Sanderson Bellamy; Megan Steven; Alastair Trickett; Andrew Voysey; Christine Watson; Darren Whitby; Kerry Whiteside

doi:10.3390/su152014783

Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation

Aled Jones, Sarah Bridle, Katherine Denby, Riaz Bhunnoo, Daniel Morton, Lucy Stanbrough, Barnaby Coupe, Vanessa Pilley, Tim Benton, Pete Falloon, Tom K. Matthews, Saher Hasnain, John S. Heslop-Harrison, Simon Beard, Julie Pierce, Jules Pretty, Monika Zurek, Alexandra Johnstone, Pete Smith, Neil GunnMolly Watson, Edward Pope, Asaf Tzachor, Caitlin Douglas, Christian Reynolds, Neil Ward, Jez Fredenburgh, Clare Pettinger, Tom Quested, Juan Pablo Cordero, Clive Mitchell, Carrie Bewick, Cameron Brown, Christopher Brown, Paul J. Burgess, Andy Challinor, Andrew Cottrell, Thomas Crocker, Thomas George, Charles J. Godfray, Rosie S. Hails, John Ingram, Tim Lang, Fergus Lyon, Simon Lusher, Tom MacMillan, Sue Newton, Simon Pearson, Sue Pritchard, Dale Sanders, Angelina Sanderson Bellamy, Megan Steven, Alastair Trickett, Andrew Voysey, Christine Watson, Darren Whitby, Kerry Whiteside

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We report the results of a structured expert elicitation to identify the most likely types of potential food system disruption scenarios for the UK, focusing on routes to civil unrest. We take a backcasting approach by defining as an end-point a societal event in which 1 in 2000 people have been injured in the UK, which 40% of experts rated as “Possible (20–50%)”, “More likely than not (50–80%)” or “Very likely (>80%)” over the coming decade. Over a timeframe of 50 years, this increased to 80% of experts. The experts considered two food system scenarios and ranked their plausibility of contributing to the given societal scenario. For a timescale of 10 years, the majority identified a food distribution problem as the most likely. Over a timescale of 50 years, the experts were more evenly split between the two scenarios, but over half thought the most likely route to civil unrest would be a lack of total food in the UK. However, the experts stressed that the various causes of food system disruption are interconnected and can create cascading risks, highlighting the importance of a systems approach. We encourage food system stakeholders to use these results in their risk planning and recommend future work to support prevention, preparedness, response and recovery planning.

Original language	English
Article number	14783
Journal	Sustainability
Volume	15
Issue number	20
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014783
Publication status	Published - 12 Oct 2023

Access to Document

10.3390/su152014783Licence: CC BY

sustainability-15-14783-v2Final published version, 1.88 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Jones, A., Bridle, S., Denby, K., Bhunnoo, R., Morton, D., Stanbrough, L., Coupe, B., Pilley, V., Benton, T., Falloon, P., Matthews, T. K., Hasnain, S., Heslop-Harrison, J. S., Beard, S., Pierce, J., Pretty, J., Zurek, M., Johnstone, A., Smith, P., ... Whiteside, K. (2023). Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation. Sustainability, 15(20), [14783]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014783

@article{c42e5bc913214ad6aaf53675b0d6bfdd,

title = "Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation",

abstract = "We report the results of a structured expert elicitation to identify the most likely types of potential food system disruption scenarios for the UK, focusing on routes to civil unrest. We take a backcasting approach by defining as an end-point a societal event in which 1 in 2000 people have been injured in the UK, which 40% of experts rated as “Possible (20–50%)”, “More likely than not (50–80%)” or “Very likely (>80%)” over the coming decade. Over a timeframe of 50 years, this increased to 80% of experts. The experts considered two food system scenarios and ranked their plausibility of contributing to the given societal scenario. For a timescale of 10 years, the majority identified a food distribution problem as the most likely. Over a timescale of 50 years, the experts were more evenly split between the two scenarios, but over half thought the most likely route to civil unrest would be a lack of total food in the UK. However, the experts stressed that the various causes of food system disruption are interconnected and can create cascading risks, highlighting the importance of a systems approach. We encourage food system stakeholders to use these results in their risk planning and recommend future work to support prevention, preparedness, response and recovery planning.",

author = "Aled Jones and Sarah Bridle and Katherine Denby and Riaz Bhunnoo and Daniel Morton and Lucy Stanbrough and Barnaby Coupe and Vanessa Pilley and Tim Benton and Pete Falloon and Matthews, {Tom K.} and Saher Hasnain and Heslop-Harrison, {John S.} and Simon Beard and Julie Pierce and Jules Pretty and Monika Zurek and Alexandra Johnstone and Pete Smith and Neil Gunn and Molly Watson and Edward Pope and Asaf Tzachor and Caitlin Douglas and Christian Reynolds and Neil Ward and Jez Fredenburgh and Clare Pettinger and Tom Quested and Cordero, {Juan Pablo} and Clive Mitchell and Carrie Bewick and Cameron Brown and Christopher Brown and Burgess, {Paul J.} and Andy Challinor and Andrew Cottrell and Thomas Crocker and Thomas George and Godfray, {Charles J.} and Hails, {Rosie S.} and John Ingram and Tim Lang and Fergus Lyon and Simon Lusher and Tom MacMillan and Sue Newton and Simon Pearson and Sue Pritchard and Dale Sanders and {Sanderson Bellamy}, Angelina and Megan Steven and Alastair Trickett and Andrew Voysey and Christine Watson and Darren Whitby and Kerry Whiteside",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

day = "12",

doi = "10.3390/su152014783",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

journal = "Sustainability",

issn = "2071-1050",

publisher = "MDPI AG",

number = "20",

}

Jones, A, Bridle, S, Denby, K, Bhunnoo, R, Morton, D, Stanbrough, L, Coupe, B, Pilley, V, Benton, T, Falloon, P, Matthews, TK, Hasnain, S, Heslop-Harrison, JS, Beard, S, Pierce, J, Pretty, J, Zurek, M, Johnstone, A, Smith, P, Gunn, N, Watson, M, Pope, E, Tzachor, A, Douglas, C, Reynolds, C, Ward, N , Fredenburgh, J, Pettinger, C, Quested, T, Cordero, JP, Mitchell, C, Bewick, C, Brown, C, Brown, C, Burgess, PJ, Challinor, A, Cottrell, A, Crocker, T, George, T, Godfray, CJ, Hails, RS, Ingram, J, Lang, T, Lyon, F, Lusher, S, MacMillan, T, Newton, S, Pearson, S, Pritchard, S, Sanders, D, Sanderson Bellamy, A, Steven, M, Trickett, A, Voysey, A, Watson, C, Whitby, D & Whiteside, K 2023, 'Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation', Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 20, 14783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014783

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation

AU - Jones, Aled

AU - Bridle, Sarah

AU - Denby, Katherine

AU - Bhunnoo, Riaz

AU - Morton, Daniel

AU - Stanbrough, Lucy

AU - Coupe, Barnaby

AU - Pilley, Vanessa

AU - Benton, Tim

AU - Falloon, Pete

AU - Matthews, Tom K.

AU - Hasnain, Saher

AU - Heslop-Harrison, John S.

AU - Beard, Simon

AU - Pierce, Julie

AU - Pretty, Jules

AU - Zurek, Monika

AU - Johnstone, Alexandra

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Gunn, Neil

AU - Watson, Molly

AU - Pope, Edward

AU - Tzachor, Asaf

AU - Douglas, Caitlin

AU - Reynolds, Christian

AU - Ward, Neil

AU - Fredenburgh, Jez

AU - Pettinger, Clare

AU - Quested, Tom

AU - Cordero, Juan Pablo

AU - Mitchell, Clive

AU - Bewick, Carrie

AU - Brown, Cameron

AU - Brown, Christopher

AU - Burgess, Paul J.

AU - Challinor, Andy

AU - Cottrell, Andrew

AU - Crocker, Thomas

AU - George, Thomas

AU - Godfray, Charles J.

AU - Hails, Rosie S.

AU - Ingram, John

AU - Lang, Tim

AU - Lyon, Fergus

AU - Lusher, Simon

AU - MacMillan, Tom

AU - Newton, Sue

AU - Pearson, Simon

AU - Pritchard, Sue

AU - Sanders, Dale

AU - Sanderson Bellamy, Angelina

AU - Steven, Megan

AU - Trickett, Alastair

AU - Voysey, Andrew

AU - Watson, Christine

AU - Whitby, Darren

AU - Whiteside, Kerry

PY - 2023/10/12

Y1 - 2023/10/12

N2 - We report the results of a structured expert elicitation to identify the most likely types of potential food system disruption scenarios for the UK, focusing on routes to civil unrest. We take a backcasting approach by defining as an end-point a societal event in which 1 in 2000 people have been injured in the UK, which 40% of experts rated as “Possible (20–50%)”, “More likely than not (50–80%)” or “Very likely (>80%)” over the coming decade. Over a timeframe of 50 years, this increased to 80% of experts. The experts considered two food system scenarios and ranked their plausibility of contributing to the given societal scenario. For a timescale of 10 years, the majority identified a food distribution problem as the most likely. Over a timescale of 50 years, the experts were more evenly split between the two scenarios, but over half thought the most likely route to civil unrest would be a lack of total food in the UK. However, the experts stressed that the various causes of food system disruption are interconnected and can create cascading risks, highlighting the importance of a systems approach. We encourage food system stakeholders to use these results in their risk planning and recommend future work to support prevention, preparedness, response and recovery planning.

AB - We report the results of a structured expert elicitation to identify the most likely types of potential food system disruption scenarios for the UK, focusing on routes to civil unrest. We take a backcasting approach by defining as an end-point a societal event in which 1 in 2000 people have been injured in the UK, which 40% of experts rated as “Possible (20–50%)”, “More likely than not (50–80%)” or “Very likely (>80%)” over the coming decade. Over a timeframe of 50 years, this increased to 80% of experts. The experts considered two food system scenarios and ranked their plausibility of contributing to the given societal scenario. For a timescale of 10 years, the majority identified a food distribution problem as the most likely. Over a timescale of 50 years, the experts were more evenly split between the two scenarios, but over half thought the most likely route to civil unrest would be a lack of total food in the UK. However, the experts stressed that the various causes of food system disruption are interconnected and can create cascading risks, highlighting the importance of a systems approach. We encourage food system stakeholders to use these results in their risk planning and recommend future work to support prevention, preparedness, response and recovery planning.

U2 - 10.3390/su152014783

DO - 10.3390/su152014783

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 20

M1 - 14783

ER -