Abstract
Individual autonomy (or self-determination) is increasingly treated by economists as a dimension of value, complementary with welfare, efficiency and distributional equality. Many contributors to this literature acknowledge Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory as providing psychological foundations for the concepts of intrinsic motivation and autonomy. In a critical examination of that theory, I argue that its intrinsic/extrinsic categorisation of motivations and its emphasis on self-realisation do not properly recognise the ways in which individuals can find satisfaction in being useful to one another. If market transactions are viewed through the lens of self-determination theory, their moral content can be obscured.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 211-234 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Review of Behavioral Economics |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 May 2024 |
Keywords
- self-realisation
- autonomy
- self-determination theoty
- usefulness
- intrinsic motivation
- self-determination
- Self-realisation
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver