TY - JOUR
T1 - Shifts in the smart research agenda? 100 priority questions to accelerate sustainable energy futures
AU - Robison, Rosie
AU - Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe
AU - Hargreaves, Tom
AU - Rënstrom, Sara
AU - Wolsink, Maarten
AU - Judson, Emily
AU - Pechancová, Viera
AU - Demirbağ-Kaplan, Melike
AU - March, Hug
AU - Lehne, Johanna
AU - Foulds, Chris
AU - Bharucha, Zareen
AU - Bilious, Liliia
AU - Büscher, Christian
AU - Carrus, Giuseppe
AU - Darby, Sarah
AU - Douzou, Sylvie
AU - Drevenšek, Mojca
AU - Frantál, Bohumil
AU - Guimarães Pereira, Ângela
AU - Karvonen, Andrew
AU - Katzeff, Cecilia
AU - Kola-Bezka, Maria
AU - Laakso, Senja
AU - Lettmayer, Gudrun
AU - Parag, Yael
AU - Sáfián, Fanni
AU - Swora, Mariusz
AU - Tjørring, Lise
AU - van der Werff, Ellen
AU - van Vliet, Bas
AU - Wallenborn, Grégoire
AU - Wyckmans, Annemie
N1 - Funding information: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 826025 (Energy-SHIFTS project). Viera Pechancová’s work was supported by the DKRVO (RP/CPS/2022/005).
Data availability: The authors have shared links to their data in the manuscript
PY - 2023/9/20
Y1 - 2023/9/20
N2 - Energy transitions are at the top of global agendas in response to the growing challenges of climate change and international conflict, with the EU positioning itself as playing a pivotal role in addressing climate risks and sustainability imperatives. European energy transition policies identify ‘smart consumption’ as a key element of these efforts, which have previously been explored from a predominantly technical perspective thus often failing to identify or address fundamental interlinkages with social systems and consequences. This paper aims to contribute to interdisciplinary energy research by analysing a forward looking ‘Horizon Scan’ research agenda for smart consumption, driven by the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Reflecting on an extensive systematic Delphi Method exercise surveying over 70 SSH scholars from various institutional settings across Europe, we highlight what SSH scholars see as future directions for smart consumption research. Building from seven thematic areas (under which are grouped 100 SSH research questions), the study identifies three key ‘shifts’ this new smart research agenda represents, when compared to previous agendas: (1) From technological inevitability to political choice, highlighting the need for a wider political critique, with the potential to open up discussions of the instrumentalisation of smart research; (2) From narrow representation to diverse inclusion, moving beyond the shortcomings of current discourses for engaging marginalised communities; and (3) From individual consumers to interconnected citizens, reframing smart consumption to offer a broader model of social change and governance. Social Sciences and Humanities scholarship is essential to address these shifts in meaningful (rather than tokenistic) ways. This agenda and the shifts it embodies represent key tools to enable better interdisciplinary working between SSH and teams from the technical and natural sciences.
AB - Energy transitions are at the top of global agendas in response to the growing challenges of climate change and international conflict, with the EU positioning itself as playing a pivotal role in addressing climate risks and sustainability imperatives. European energy transition policies identify ‘smart consumption’ as a key element of these efforts, which have previously been explored from a predominantly technical perspective thus often failing to identify or address fundamental interlinkages with social systems and consequences. This paper aims to contribute to interdisciplinary energy research by analysing a forward looking ‘Horizon Scan’ research agenda for smart consumption, driven by the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Reflecting on an extensive systematic Delphi Method exercise surveying over 70 SSH scholars from various institutional settings across Europe, we highlight what SSH scholars see as future directions for smart consumption research. Building from seven thematic areas (under which are grouped 100 SSH research questions), the study identifies three key ‘shifts’ this new smart research agenda represents, when compared to previous agendas: (1) From technological inevitability to political choice, highlighting the need for a wider political critique, with the potential to open up discussions of the instrumentalisation of smart research; (2) From narrow representation to diverse inclusion, moving beyond the shortcomings of current discourses for engaging marginalised communities; and (3) From individual consumers to interconnected citizens, reframing smart consumption to offer a broader model of social change and governance. Social Sciences and Humanities scholarship is essential to address these shifts in meaningful (rather than tokenistic) ways. This agenda and the shifts it embodies represent key tools to enable better interdisciplinary working between SSH and teams from the technical and natural sciences.
KW - Energy justice
KW - Energy transitions
KW - Prosumer
KW - Research funding
KW - Smart consumption
KW - Socio-technical systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166133518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137946
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137946
M3 - Article
VL - 419
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
SN - 0959-6526
M1 - 137946
ER -
